• Document No.

  • Audit Title

  • Client / Site

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location
  • Personnel



  • 1 List the square footage by area E.g. Producton, warehouse

  • 2 Does the supplier have a formal capacity plan and analysis methodology that is used and maintained?

  • 3 List the current floor space utilisation (percentage)

  • 6 Does the facility build tooling in house? <br>If so, what percentage?<br><br>7 Does the facility refurbish tools in house?

  • 4 List the impact of quoted business on floor space utilisation (percentage) in Comments

  • 5 List the capacity utilisation for the next 5 years (including forcasted new business)

  • 10 Is the facility unionized?

  • 8 list the emoloyee turnover rate for for the last 2 years in Comments

  • 9 does the supplier document responsibilities and authority?

  • 11 List the facility's language capabilities in Comments

Profile information

  • 1 How long has the facility been in the business thay are quoting?

  • 2 What products or services does the facility manufacture?

  • 3 Specify other manufacturing location(s) available for this product

  • [4 If a special process service provider, is the supplier compliant with applicable AIAG special process assessments (CQI 9)]

  • 5 Is the company publicly owned?<br>If not, list the owner(s)

  • 6 Is there any pending litigation against the supplier/facility?<br>If yes, explain.

  • 7 Does the company anticipate a change in ownership in the next 3 years?<br>If yes, explain in Comments

  • 8 What is the suppliers on-time delivery percentage for production and service parts for the last 2 years?

  • 9 Does the supplier export products?<br>If so, list the countries.

  • 10 Are the responsibilities defined for any direct buys?

LOGISTICS (reference MMOG-LE for good logistics assessment)

  • 3 What are the average days of finished product inventory on hand?

  • 4 Does the facility use a pull system inventory management with FIFO?

  • 5 Does the supplier have internal packaging design capabilities?

  • 1 What are the different modes of transportation used to ship product?



  • 1 Is all standard work, such as job instrctions with appropriate and complete information, effectively implemented?

  • 2 Are special characteristics, including PTCs, identified at the stations that produce those characteristics?

  • 3 Are special characteristics appropriately controlled at the operation(s) that produce them?

  • 4 Is there evidence of appropriateand adequate operator training?

  • 5 Is the capacity determined apprpriately, including forecasts of new business

  • 6 Is process capability and performance maintained at levels originally approved by the customer PPAP?

  • 7 Are resources available for functional / durability testing?

  • 8 Are resources available for calibration?

  • 9 Is the work place properly organized, e.g. 5S, lean, ergonomic?

  • 12 Are knowledgeable resources available to carry out machinery and equipment maintenance?

  • 11 Have there been any major health and safety recordables within the last 5 years?

  • 10 Is personal safety equipment provided?

  • 13 Are preventive maintenance processs in place for all machinery?

  • 14 Are spare parts readily available to maintain the key machinery and equipment?

  • 17 Are there trained resources available to carry out tool/ die/ mold maintenance?

  • 16 Are there trained resources available for tools/ gauges/ molds fabrication?

  • 15 Are there knowledgeable resources available to design tools ad gauges in house?

  • 18 Is there a business continuity plan in place in the event of disaster?

  • 19 Does the facility have a plan to cover any abseenteism?

  • 21 Does the supplier have prototype fabrication capability in house?

  • 23 Are skill and competency requirements identified?

  • 22 Does the supplier select resources based on education, training, experience, and/or requirements?

  • 24 Is a formal process identified to protect the pipeline supply chain and provide safety inventory?



  • 1 Does the supplier demonstrate an understanding of Process Validation?

  • 2 Does the supplier have adequate purchased product controls in place for sub-tier suppliers, e.g. assessment, metrics, terms and conditions?

  • 3 Does the suplier have a process / system in place to ensure that all design requirements / engineering specifications are communicted to their supply base?

  • 4 Does the supplier have an effective change management process, including interface with suppliers?

  • 5 Does the supplier ensure early sub-tier supplier involvement in APQP?

  • 6 Does the supplier have an effective internal audit - management review process?

  • 7 Is non-conforming material adequtely identified, sgregated and dispositioned?

  • 8 Does the supplier have effective product traceability through sub-tier suppliers, including for PTCs? To what extent (lot vs. part)?

  • 9 Does the suplier demonstrate effective use of FMEA, e.g., DFMEA/PFMEA quantifies risk, identifies special chacteristic for use in the Control Plan, takes action to reduce ongoing risk, uses appropriate criteria to calculate risk, e.g., severity?

  • 10 Does the supplier demonstrate conformance to requirements specified or reerenced in the control plan?

  • 11 Is there linkage between the design record, DFMEA/PFMEA,Control plan, and Operator Instructions, e.g., special characteristics are identified by the supplier, effective and unterstandable controls are specified fo affectd operators to use?

  • 12 Does the supplier have the capability of retrieving current drawings/ specifications for use on floor inspection?

  • 13 Does the supplier have appropriate product verification activities from receiving through product realization and shipping, including material identification?

  • 14 Does the supplier comply with acceptable measurement system analysis, e.g. measurement uncertainty is known?

  • 15 Does the supplier maintain effective calibration of test and measurement equipment used, e.g., production, quality assurance?

  • 16 Does the supplier effectivey use statistical methods, addressing both variable and attributive data, as applicable, for process control?

  • 17 Does the supplier have experience using AIAG core tool documents, e.g., MSA, SPC, APQP, FMEA, PPAP?

  • 18 Does the supplier conduct equipment validation and perform run at rate in prepration for production?

  • 19 Are mistake-proofing and error-proofing provisions effectively used to control Special Characteristics and ensure product integrity?

  • 20 Does the supplier have an effective problem solving process, e.g., AIAG CQI-10?

  • 21 Does the supplier have an effective process to engage employees in quality and innovation?

  • 22 What is the facilities current external PPM?

  • 23 Is the facility covered by any 3rd party certifications? If so, list them with expiry dates.

  • 24 Does the supplier have an end-of-life management process, e.g. controlled ramp-down, to protect customer quality and schedules?

  • 25 Does the supplier have a process to review and rreduce warranty costs, e.g., analysis returned parts, use of effective problem solving?


  • 1 Can the supplier provide prompt technical support at the organization when needed?

  • 2 Does the supplier inform thei supply chain of the application/ indended use of their product, e.g. to prevent inappropriate use of the product?

  • 3 Does the supplier have electronic data transfer capability?

  • 4 Does the supplier have CAD/CAE resources on site? List the number of seats and the program used, e.g., UG, Catia.

  • 5 Does the supplier demonstrate effective design validation?

  • 6 Does the supplier hae experience with approriate design evaluation tools, e.g., FEA, HALT, CAE, simulation?

  • 7 Does the supplier have experience developing effective DFMEA?

  • 8 Is benchmarking effectively used to develop new products and processes?

  • 9 Are formal documented design reviews by the appropriate functions conducted at appropriate stages of design per a design plan?

  • 10 Is there evidence of regular design and development reviews with customers?

  • 11 Does the supplier have an efective document control system, e.g., document revision status readily available?

  • 12 Is the supplier capable of supporting our design and development schedule?

  • 13 Is performance testing that includes, as appropriate, life, durability, and reliability, tracked for timely completion and conformance?

  • 14 Does the supplier have an effective process for capturing and deploying lessons learned?

  • 15 Are technical reviews completed to address all open issues?

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. Any ratings or scores displayed in our Public Library have not been verified by SafetyCulture for accuracy. Users of our platform may provide a rating or score that is incorrect or misleading. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances. You can use our Public Library to search based on criteria such as industry and subject matter. Search results are based on their relevance to your search and other criteria. We may feature checklists based on subject matters we think may be of interest to our customers.