Title Page

  • Site conducted

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Location

TrainingATPL Content

ATPL Structure

Training Plan compliance

  • EASA Reference Part FCL.515 (100 KSA) Part ORA.ATO.300

  • ATO Reference TRM.ATPL.DL A / OM section 4

ATPL Training

  • EASA Reference ORA.ATO.230 & AMC1 ORA.ATO.230 FCL.515 requirements AMC 1 FCL 310

  • ATO Reference TRM.ATPL DL.A /Master ATPL Matrix / ATO.IFR.001

  • Is training programme compatible with EASA LO's

  • Is Structure of ATPL course described?

  • Does a procedure exist to modify a sequence in the course?

  • Are Lesson plans presented?

  • Are defined timing (per subject) matching hours allocated and delivered?

  • Are assigned TKIs standardised and approved for the subject delivered?

  • Is the balance between supervised CBT hours and TKI teaching hours respected?

  • Teaching materials do they match Academy's standards in term of structure?

  • Teaching materials do they match TRM Content

  • Is the training content assessed during CTKI supervision

  • Is course delivery technique respected ? (TRM.ATPL.DL D.3.2.4)

Training Records

  • TRM ATPL DL A.7.0/ Flight Logger (students profile)

  • Is there a process to check attendance

  • Is there a management of non-justified absence?

  • Are all justified absence correctly handled (studying instructions-post absence checks)

  • Is there a process to check the training records

  • Is the process efficient to assess student's progression?

  • Is the student's progression actively monitored?

  • Is training records template standardised?

  • Is there an assigned staff responsible to check training records?

  • Is the nature and the frequency if the check defined in the process?

  • Is the staff updating the records is entitled for it?

  • Safety Training TRM.ATPL.A8

  • Is safety culture promoted towards the students?

  • Are students informed how to report a safety related event?

  • Are students informed about emergency/contengencies procedures?

  • Assessment, tests and examination TRM.ATPL A.9

  • Does a testing/evaluation policy defined?

  • Are the defined numbers of tests completed?

  • Are Formative assessments performed (minimum 1)?

  • Were summative assessment efficient to : Motivate Students,<br>Identify strength and weakness and <br>Promote learning ?

  • Is there a feed back policy in place (Students/TKIs) to detect training deficiencies?

  • Are those feedback properly used to improve training effectiveness?

  • Are Summative assessments performed (minimum 2)?

  • Were Summative assessments conducted at the end of training and that lead to the issue of a licence and/or rating, have both legal and safety implications and therefore the personnel carrying out these assessments should have the necessary competencies to assess objectively and meet the authority’s requirements?

  • Is there a process to analyse the Final exams results and Authorise for NAA exams?

  • Are the decisions in accordance to the process?

  • Were some exceptions granted ?

  • Was the exception in line with the process and documented?

  • Training effectivness TRM ATPL. A.10

  • Is the testing policy efficiency to relate to the training objectives?

  • Are there data statistics to support these assessments?

  • Are data analysis conducted to evaluate the training efficiency?

  • Are the appropriate company's defined softwares used to let circulate informations between HT/CTKI/CKI and CMM/AM?

  • Is the designed procedure to suspend a student from training applied?

  • Are remediation defined as per the process?

  • Has the remediation offered improved the performance?

  • Was the remediation properly designed and supervised?

Audit outcome

  • Findings

  • Root cause Analysis

  • Corrective action Plan (CAP)

  • Responsible for CAP

  • Due Date

Safety Assessment

  • Is safety Impacted

  • Safety Event raised ?

  • Safety Event reference

Audit Performance and Completion

  • Has the audit been completed on time

  • Date

  • Signature

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. Any ratings or scores displayed in our Public Library have not been verified by SafetyCulture for accuracy. Users of our platform may provide a rating or score that is incorrect or misleading. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances. You can use our Public Library to search based on criteria such as industry and subject matter. Search results are based on their relevance to your search and other criteria. We may feature checklists based on subject matters we think may be of interest to our customers.