Information
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
-
Personnel
-
Corridor
Ensure all contractors have the required competencies (roles on Onsite) to complete the task.
-
Poor - Competencies not checked.
Fair - Contractors checked but roles they are carrying out are not cross checked against the roles on Onsite.
Good - All roles checked against competent roles on within Onsite Trackeasy.
Best Practice - As Good but expiry dates checked to ensure that they will be within date at completion of the project. -
How would you describe the compliance with ensuring all contractors have the required competencies (roles on Onsite) to complete the task?
Ensure the Contractors have been inducted onto site and have been briefed on ARTC Procedures including Work Method Statements where applicable
-
Poor - Contractors not inducted onto site.
Fair - Contractors inducted onto site but have little knowledge or ARTC procedures.
Good - All contractors inducted onto site and are fully briefed including WMS (where applicable) an aware of the task to be completed and whom to report to.
Best Practice - As good but Contractors have knowledge of “Hazard/Near Miss Reporting system and are actively encouraged to report issues on site. -
How would you describe the compliance of ensuring that contractors have been inducted onto site and have been briefed on ARTC Procedures including Work Method Statements where applicable?
Ensure contractor work is done to specifications and meets ARTC standards.
-
Poor - Contractor work done does not conform to specifications and does not meet ARTC Standards.
Fair - Contractor work meets specifications with minor non-conformances to ARTC standards.
Good - Contractor work confirms to specifications and meets ARTC standards.
Best Practice - Contractor work exceeds expectations set out in specifications and carried out to a higher standard than specified by ARTC. -
How would you describe ensuring contractors work is done to specifications and meets ARTC standards?
Ensure close supervision and regular checks and audits are carried out on contractors
-
Poor - No supervision of contractors.
Fair - Some supervision but little intervention for critical issues.
Good - Good supervision and visibility of ARTC on contractor worksites, some checks and spot audits carried out.
Beat Practice - As good but including full audit/check plan detailed in the Project Management Plan. -
How would you describe ensuring close supervision and regular checks and audits are carried out on contractors?
