Title Page
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client
-
Client
-
Add location
-
I/we being the competent person(s) responsible (as indicated by my/our signatures below) for the commissioning of the fire alarm system, particulars of which are set out below, CERTIFY that the said work I/we have been responsible complies to the best of my/our knowledge and belief with the recommendations of Clause 39 of BS5839-1, except for the variations, if any, stated on this certificate
-
Engineers Name
-
Engineers Position
-
Add signature
-
Select date
-
For and behalf of Worth Fire Protection Limited. 93 Long Catlis Road, Rainham, Gillingham, Kent. ME8 9QE.
-
The extent of liability of the signatory is limited to the system described below.
-
Extent of system covered by this certificate:-
-
Variations from the recommendations of Clause 39 of BS5839-1 (see BS5839-1, Clause 7):-
-
All equipment operates correctly.
-
Installation work is, as far as can be reasonably be ascertained, of an acceptable standard.
-
The entire system has been inspected & tested in accordance with the recommendations of 39.2c of BS5839-1
-
The system performs as required by the specification prepared by
-
A copy of which I/we have been given.
-
Taking into account the guidance contained in Section 3 of BS5839-1. I/we have not identified any obvious potential for any unacceptable rate of false alarms.
-
The documentation described in Clause 40 of BS5839-1-1 has been provided to the user.
-
The following work should be completed before/after the system becomes operational:- (Please specify before or after)
-
The following potential causes of false alarms should be considered at the time of the next service visit:-
-
Before the system becomes operational, it should be soak tested in accordance with the recommendations of 35.2.6 of BS5839-1 for a period of:-
