Information

  • Site Name

  • Conducted on

  • Name of SHEQ completing this audit:

  • Personnel

  • Location
  • Audit Crib Sheet - SHEQ

  • Picture1.png
  • NOTE: See the Control of Non-Conformances, Corrective & Preventive Actions - in support of the below observations - Click Open Document ➡️

  • Type of Audit

Health & Safety

1) Safety management

  • 1.1) Is health and safety a regular item of discussion via staff committees etc?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 1.2) Do all managers / supervisors complete a site safety inspection monthly with evidence of actions taken?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 1.3) Is the zero harm planner an active document with evidence of regular updates and staff involvement?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 1.4) Has it been reviewed, updated and RAG's within the last quarter?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 1.5) Can the site produce a list of open NCRs from the Engie Information Management System?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 1.6) For those that have been closed in the last 12 months can they show 1 example (1 to 10 closures) 2 examples (20 to 50 closures) 3 examples (51 and above) physical evidence of closure e.g. records, completion certificate, appointment letter, correspondence, new/modified asset/procedure/process etc.

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

2) Policies and procedures

  • 2.1) Is the correct Health and Safety poster displayed?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 2.2) Is it accurately completed with all necessary information?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 2.3) Are relevant policies and procedures displayed as required?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 2.4) Is the zero harm board displayed and well used?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

3) Accident and near miss reporting

  • 3.1) Has CID been rolled out to all managers / staff?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.2) Are staff able to describe the accident reporting procedure?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.3) Are there posters / cards etc provided to staff detailing the Incident Reporting Line number?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.4) Do they know how to raise a near miss and can they describe a typical near miss?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.5) How many near misses have been reported in the last month?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.6) Review a recent accident report / investigation. Is it completed appropriately with evidence of remedial actions taken?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

4) Fire safety

  • 4.1) Does the site have a suitable fire risk assessment?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.2) When was it last completed / reviewed?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.3) When were the fire extinguishers last tested?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.4) Who were they tested by?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.5) Are extinguishers, alarm call points etc in appropriate locations, maintained and tested in line with guidance?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.6) When was the last fire drill?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.7) Is fire signage appropriate and clear?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.8) Are all fire doors listed on an asset register with evidence of 6 monthly checks?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.9) Are all fire dampers and shutters listed on an asset register and are annual service records available?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.10) Are the emergency lighting check records available and complete - monthly function test, annual duration test etc?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

5) First aid

  • 5.1) Are there adequate first aid boxes, eye wash stations etc on site?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 5.2) Are there adequate first aiders on site that cover 'out of normal hours' if required?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

6) Welfare facilities

  • 6.1) Are the facilities sufficient, clean and appropriate?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 6.2) Are there sufficient facilities for washing and eating etc?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

7) Working environment

  • 7.1) Is lighting adequate?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.2) Is the temperature adequate?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.3) Are noise levels appropriate?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.4) Is there sufficient space for staff and activities?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.5) Is the environment clean and free from dust etc?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.6) Are all access routes clear, well defined and in good condition?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.7) Are vehicle / pedestrian routes separate and clearly marked?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

8) Manual handling

  • 8.1) Have manual handling assessments been completed for all high risk tasks?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 8.2) Have all staff received recent manual handling training?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 8.3) Are there adequate manual handling aids on site for staff use?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

9) Working at height

  • 9.1) Is there a work at height register in place?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 9.2) Have all staff received training in the use of access equipment - ladders, steps, MEWPS etc

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 9.3) Is the access equipment register in place, upto date and understood by staff?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 9.4) Is all access equipment tagged and clearly showing an ID and date of inspection?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 9.5) Is work at height well controlled using permits, assessments, POWRA and management control?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 9.6) Have managers received training in controlling safe work at height?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

10) Work equipment

  • 10.1) Is there a log of all work equipment used on site?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 10.2) Where is this kept and in what form?

  • Documentation:

  • 10.3) Is all work equipment maintained, calibrated and tested where necessary?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 10.4) Have machinery risk assessments been completed for higher risk equipment?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 10.5) Do staff have adequate training for the use of higher risk equipment?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 10.6) Is all equipment properly and adequately guarded to current standards?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 10.7) Does the site have lifts?

  • 10.8) Please provide a copy of the insurance test certificate

  • Documentation:

  • 10.9) Are hand tools properly used, maintained and stored?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

11) Occupational health

  • 11.1) If a noise assessment is required, is it complete, in date and have remedial actions been taken?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 11.2) Is hearing protection provided and used by staff as necessary?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 11.3) Have staff received hearing tests?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

12) Electrical safety

  • 12.1) When was the last fixed wiring test?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 12.2) Do new electrical installations and minor electrical works have test and inspection records available? Please provide evidence.

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 12.3) Are leads, cables, sockets etc maintained in good order and kept tidy?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

13) Risk assessment

  • 13.1) Is there evidence of practical risk assessment being used on site?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 13.2) Is it suitable and sufficient?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 13.3) Are point of work risk assessments or PDA based assessment being used for all higher risk tasks?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 13.4) Have adequate method statements and / or safe systems of work been created as a result of risk assessments?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 13.5) Do staff understand the purpose of risk assessment and change their behaviour as a result?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 13.6) Have specific assessments been completed for pregnant / breast feeding mothers, those with disabilities and young workers?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

14) Display screen equipment

  • 14.1) Have all staff who use a computer completed DSE assessments?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 14.2) Do staff understand the eye test procedure?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 14.3) Have staff been trained in taking work breaks, screen position etc?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 14.4) Is there an action plan for staff with higher risk?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

15) COSHH

  • 15.1) Are chemicals safety stored?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 15.2) Are COSHH assessments completed for all substances?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 15.3) Where is this kept? Is it Sypol based or an alternative? Is it up to date?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 15.4) Are there clear instructions on the use of substances available for all staff?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 15.5) Are staff competent in the delivery, use, storage and disposal of substances they use?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 15.6) Is there adequate signage for chemical stores and PPE?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

16) PPE

  • 16.1) Is adequate PPE provided for all staff?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 16.2) Please provide examples of PPE used on the site / Contract

  • Documentation:

  • 16.3) Are staff trained in the use of PPE where required?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 16.4) Is a record kept of PPE issue to staff?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

17) Asbestos

  • 17.1) Does the site have an asbestos register that is upto date, accurate and easy to understand?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 17.2) Do all sites where the contract staff operate also have a register, reviewed, available for staff and updated with any previous asbestos works highlighted?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 17.3) Are all relevant staff trained annually in asbestos awareness?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 17.4) Have relevant staff received face fit testing?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

18) Sub Contractors

  • 18.1) Is good control of sub contractors maintained?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 18.2) Please provide evidence of control of contractors on site

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 18.3) Are all sub contractors required to sign in and out?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 18.4) While on site, are subcontractors managed effectively?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 18.5) How are they managed to ensure they are conforming to Company expectations?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 18.6) Is there evidence of sub contractor RAMS being used on site? Have these been checked by site staff?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 18.7) Have all new Contractors received the new Contractor Induction Video and is there evidence that this is being used on site?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

19) Safety training

  • 19.1) Are staff provably competent to undertake their roles?

  • Comments

  • Documentation:

  • 19.2) Is the safety training matrix available and up to date?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 19.3) Does the site have adequate first aiders and fire marshalls?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 19.4) Is there a register of tool box talks to be held over the next 12 months available?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 19.5) Do all staff receive at least 1 tool box talk per month?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 19.6) Have all new staff received a Company Induction.

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

20) Inspection of flues in voids. When working on a boiler served by a concealed chimney/flue there are some additional boiler operational safety checks which should be carried out to ensure the boilers are safely functioning:

  • Health and Safety Bulletin 01 17 - Inspection of flues in voids

  • 20.1) That the combustion performance of the appliance is correct in all modes of operation and complies with Manufacturer’s instructions?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 20.2) That plume/heat discharge from the chimney/flue termination is in line with manufacturer’s guidelines?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 20.3) No evidence of distress on the enclosure or staining on the ceiling along the route of the chimney/flue?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 20.4) No previous history of issues with chimney/flues at the address or neighbouring properties?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 20.5) Wherever possible a visual inspection of the flue in the void is to be carried out. Where this is not possible the advice of the relevant Authorising Engineer (Gas) is to be sought?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

21) Overall Section Summary

  • Major

  • Minor

  • Observation

  • Opportunity for Improvement

  • Note-Worthy Effort

22) Additional Observations Requiring Attention

  • SHEQ Signature

  • Site Manager Signature:

  • Zero Harm.png

Quality Audit

1) Business Management System Implementation

  • 1.1) Has the Business Management System been implemented across the Contract / Site?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

2) Business Management System Compliance

  • 2.1) Is there full compliance against all the relevant elements of the Business Management System within the Contract / Site?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

3) Sector Procedures / Processes

  • 3.1) Are there any Sector Procedures / processes in place? Have they been developed to support specific situational requirements? Do they meet and/or exceed the requirements outlined within the relevant ENGIE Procedure? Was the development / implementation agreed with the Sector Head of SHEQ and Head of Quality?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

4) Local Operating Procedures (LOP) / Processes

  • 4.1) Are there any Local Operating Procedure / processes in place? Have they been developed to support customer or situational requirements at a Contract/Site Level? Do they meet and/or exceed the requirements outlined within the relevant Engie Procedure and / or BUP Procedures? Was the development / implementation agreed with the BU Head of SHEQ?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

5) Customer Focused Processes

  • 5.1) Is a periodic review conducted to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of all customer focused processes?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

6) Availability of Contract Documentation

  • 6.1) Are all the relevant documents available to appropriate people, e.g. Security Plans, Cleaning Schedules, etc,?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

7) Client Meetings

  • 7.1) Is there evidence of routine client meetings to review performance and assist developing improvement plans e.g. through the client review or minutes from client meetings?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

8) Customer Communications & Reporting.

  • 8.1) Are customer expectations regarding communication, and performance reporting understood, and is there a Communication Plan in place to manage these?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

9) Recruitment Procedures

  • 9.1) Is there evidence that company recruitment procedures are being followed?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

10) Reference/Clearance Checking

  • 10.1) Is Engie legally compliant (Starters and where renewals/re-certification's) in areas such as for example 'Right to Work in the UK', 'CRB Checks' and 'SIA Checks'? For those checks that require renewals / re-certification's, evidence that renewals have been carried out is essential.

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

11) Induction - Checklist

  • 11.1) Has an Induction Checklist been completed for all new employees that started within the past 12 months?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

12) Induction - 1.2.1 with Manager / Supervisor

  • 12.1) Have all new starters and transferees received a 1.2.1 induction with their Manager / Supervisor on day one of employment?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

13) Full Company Induction

  • 13.1) Have all new starters and transferees received a full company induction and signed off (in conjunction with their manager) their 12 week induction programme?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

14) 12 Week Performance Reviews

  • 14.1) Have all new starters and transferees received a 12 week performance review with Manager / Supervisor?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

15) Annual TOP3 Review - All Employees

  • 15.1) Has every employee received an annual TOP3 review and had objectives set?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

16) Annual TOP3 Review - All Managers

  • 16.1) Have all managers had a TOP3 performance development review and objectives set linked to the business plan?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

17) Management Attendance at Mandatory Training

  • 17.1) Have managers attended mandatory training as defined by the learning and development department? And is there evidence? (Mandatory training = Sustainability, Data Protection, Code of Conduct and Competition Compliance).

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

18) Training Records

  • 18.1 Are there records of any training that has been organised and delivered locally, and is their evidence that the details have been passed to HR for up-dating of central records?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

19) Training Reviews

  • 19.1 Do managers discuss the impact of training on contract/individual's performance? E.g. post course discussions

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

20) Supplier Approval Process

  • 20.1) Is knowledge of the Supplier Approval process in evidence and its application understood?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

21) Purchase to Pay Process

  • 21.1) Is the Purchase to Pay Process understood?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

22) Preferred Supplier List

  • 22.1) Can you identify the current Preferred Supplier list, and show knowledge and use of preferred arrangements?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

23) PR Approval as per LOA

  • 23.1) Is there knowledge of approvers and are requisitions approved within the appropriate limits of authority?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

24) Purchase Card Process

  • 24.1) Is there evidence to demonstrate that the Purchase Card process is being adhered to?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

25) Sub Contractor Service Level Agreements

  • 25.1) Are the service levels in the main agreement passed down to sub-contractors contractually for sub-contracted works?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

26) Supplier Feedback Process

  • 26.1) Is the process and need to provide supplier feedback understood?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

27) Competitive Bidding, Selection & Requisition Process

  • 27.1) For variable/additional works on site is there evidence of compliance with the competitive bidding, selection and requisition process?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

28) Emergency Supplier / Sub Contractor Engagement Process

  • 28.1) Is the use of the Emergency Supplier/Sub-contractor engagement process understood and can it be demonstrated?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

29) Performance of Sub Contractors

  • 29.1) Are there current records tracking the performance of sub-contractors?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

30) Hospitality Register

  • 30.1) Is there evidence that the use of the Engie Hospitality Register is understood?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

31) Control of Records

  • 31.1) Are all documents, including those of external origin adequately controlled?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

32) Control of Records

  • 32.1) Is there an effective system for the control, storage, retrieval, review and disposal of records?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

33) Contract Audit Schedule

  • 33.1) Is there a documented local audit schedule, e.g, SHEQ audits, legal compliance audits, contractual compliance audits, client audits and LOP's audits?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

34) Client Audit Schedules

  • 34.1) Does the site know the date when all independent audits of the contract are due to be performed?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

35) Control of Non-Conformances

  • 35.1) Is the ENGIE Information Management System used for recording audits & improvement actions?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

36) Audit Finding Closure

  • 36.1) Have all audit findings been acted upon and closed out within the stated timescales? Do any remain outstanding?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

37) Customer Feedback

  • 37.1) Is there evidence of routine customer feedback to measure customer confidence, e.g. through the customer experience survey or alternative method to capture customer confidence?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

38) Data Analysis

  • 38.1) Has consideration been given to the use of statistical techniques and is appropriate monitoring data analysed? e.g. are there graphs or charts of performance trends?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

39) Continual Improvement Commitment

  • 39.1) Is there evidence of the contract management team's commitment to continual improvement?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

40) Protection of Customer Property

  • 40.1) Are appropriate methods of handling employed to ensure goods and equipment are protected from damage?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

41) Customer Data / Information Protection

  • 41.1) Is all customer data and information safeguarded and protected?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

42) Business Continuity Plan (BCP)

  • 42.1) Has the contract created and implemented a Business Continuity Plan? If so, what is the last date of issue?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 42.2) Have the BCP procedures been fully tested and the results documented? If so, do BCP Test Record & Results exist?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

44) Contract Business Management System Reviews

  • 44.1) Is there a schedule of Business Management System reviews, covering HSEQ performance?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

45) Overall Section Summary

  • Major

  • Minor

  • Observation

  • Opportunity for Improvement

  • Noteworthy Effort

46) Additional Observations Requiring Attention

  • SHEQ Signature:

  • Site Manager Signature:

  • Zero Harm.png

ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT

1) Induction & Training

  • 1.1) Are records available on site for the delivery of the environmental induction?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 1.2) Examples of environmental toolbox talks delivered in the last 12 months?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation

2) Compliance

  • 2.1) Evidence that previous audit findings (internal and external) have been closed?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 2.2) Have Contractual requirements (environmental) been met?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 2.3) Are all relevant environmental permits (waste carrier's licences, PPC permits, discharge consents or exemptions in place?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 2.4) Is evidence available that the conditions of the permit are being met?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

3) Risk Assessment

  • 3.1 Environmental Aspects Register is complete and has been reviewed in the past 12 months?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.2) Has the environmental legal register been reviewed in the last 12 months?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.3) Can evidence of compliance be demonstrated against columns G, H and N?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 3.4) All COSHH risk assessments are in place for substances used on contract?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

4) Waste Management

  • 4.1) All Waste Duty of Care records available?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.2) Is waste stored/segregated in suitable containers?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.3) Has a TEEP assessment been carried out on site by a contractor or by the site themselves?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.4) Consignee/Producer Returns are available?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.5) Relevant staff involved in completing and issuing waste records have received training?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.6) Have relevant staff received waste classification training within the last 12 months?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.7) Is the correct waste code for the legal entity the contract/site is part of being used?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.8) Are all waste streams we are responsible for been identified with processes in place to manage them appropriately?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.9) Is recycling operating effectively on site?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.10) Does the site have appropriate records of waste disposal - transfer notes etc?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.12) If the site has an Fgas register, is it completed correctly and accurately?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 4.11) Are contracted waste carriers registered as a carrier or broker?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

5) Oil Storage

  • 5.1) Oil Storage Regulations are followed on the contract?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

6) Management of Refrigerant Gas

  • 6.1 F-Gas Register in place and in date?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 6.2) Engineers handling refrigerants are qualified and competent to do so?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

7) Environmental Incidents

  • 7.1 No environmental incidents in the past 12 months?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.2) Investigation completed for all incidents?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.3) Evidence that environmental incidents / near misses have been logged?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.4) Have any incidents that have occurred been a level C or above for actual severity?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 7.5) Are staff aware of the incident escalation process for incidents?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

8) Management of sub-contractors

  • 8.1) All sub-contractors have approved MS and RAs?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

9) Emergency Response

  • 9.1) Spill kits are in place at chemical/oil storage areas?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 9.2) All relevant staff have been trained in the correct use and disposal of chemical and/or oil spill kits?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 9.3) An emergency response plan is in place and has been tested?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

10) Corporate Responsibility Action Plan

  • 10.1) Corporate Responsibility Action Plan is in place and in date?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 10.2) Are there any examples of how we've worked with the client to help meet their sustainability objectives? (Volunteering, energy or waste reduction etc?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 10.3) Is the contract community engagement plan available and updated?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

11) Communications

  • 11.1) Have local environmental compliance bulletins been communicated across the contract in the last month?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

  • 11.2) Environmental Policy statement is displayed on the notice board?

  • Comments:

  • Documentation:

12) Overall Section Summary

  • Major

  • Minor

  • Observation

  • Opportunity for Improvement

  • Noteworthy Effort

13) Additional Observations Requiring Attention

  • Name of the person that timescales have been agreed with on site to close actions.

  • SHEQ Signature:

  • Site Manager Signature:

  • Environmental.jpg.png
The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.