Information

  • Site conducted

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

Previous Inspection

  • This section is the progress review of the most recent audit undertaken

  • Has the last inspection been reviewed

  • Have all the outstanding actions been addressed

Standard 1.1 :: An approved learning framework informs the development of a curriculum that enhances each child’s learning and development.

  • Does the service have an approved learning framework that informs the development of the curriculum?

  • Please identify the relevant learning framework:

  • Does the program contribute the five outcomes of the Early Years Learning Framework for each child?

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.1.1 - Curriculum decision making contributes to each child’s learning and development outcomes in relation to their identity, connection with community, wellbeing, confidence as learners and effectiveness as communicators.

  • List evidence

  • Does our program contribute the outcomes of the Early Years Learning Framework or My Time, Our Place for each child?

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.1.2 - Each child’s current knowledge, ideas, culture, abilities and interests are the foundation of the program.

  • List evidence

  • Is there clear evidence of each child’s developmental needs, interests and participation in the educational program?

  • Is documentation readily understandable by educators and parents?

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.1.3 - The program, including routines, is organised in ways that maximise opportunities for each child’s learning.

  • List evidence

  • Is the flexible daily routine displayed in each studio?

  • Is the flexible daily routine responsive to the learning needs of children?

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.1.4 - The documentation about each child’s program and progress is available to families.

  • List evidence

  • Are the Storypark Child Notes (individual observations) and Weekly Learning Threads (learning stories) are up to date?

  • Please go to the following link to access the Guilding Principle - Reflection and Doucmentation Framework. http://www.holroyd.nsw.gov.au/children/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2016/11/Guilding-Principle-Reflection-and-Documentation-Framework-2016-September.pdf

  • There are strategies in place to promote families access to Storypark?

  • List stratergies here

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.1.5 - Every child is supported to participate in the program.

  • List evidence

  • Are children’s day book entries uploaded onto Storypark?

  • Add screen shot of day book entry

  • Are children’s summative assessments uploaded onto Storypark?

  • Add media

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.1.6 - Each child’s agency is promoted, enabling them to make choices and decisions and to influence events and their world.

  • List evidence

  • Do the children have access to a variety of age appropriate learning materials?

  • Are all learning material is in good condition (no missing or broken parts)?

Standard 1.2 :: Educators and co-ordinators are focused, active and reflective in designing and delivering the program for each child.

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.2.1 - Each child's learning and development is assessed as part of an ongoing cycle of planning, documenting and evaluation.

  • List evidence

  • Is the program regularly assessed and updated to suit the needs of children?

  • Does documentation clearly show the process of evaluation (Studio/Educator journal notes)?

  • Are all Educators are able to understand and explain the program?

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.2.2 - Educators respond to children's ideas and play and use intentional teaching to scaffold and extend each child's learning.

  • List evidence

  • Are intentional teaching moments clearly reflected in examples on Storypark?

  • Is there evidence of Element 1.2.3 - Critical reflection on children's learning and development, both as individuals and in groups, is regularly used to implement the program.

  • List evidence

  • Does the curriculum clearly demonstrate the use of critical reflection?

Audit finalisation

  • Select date

  • Audit completed by

  • Centre Manager Acceptance

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.