Scope of Audit

Opening meeting

List attendees and their roles.

  • Complete attendance register

  • Objectives of the audit. -Not to reject the system -re-currence may point to system failure - cant cover all aspects. -where no non-conformance detected does not mean non exist sample of activities.

  • Review of audit programme:

  • Company representative

  • Names

  • Function of company representative:

  • Time of closing meeting:

  • Confidentiality

  • Reasons for aborting audit:

  • Invite questions

  • Comments

Overview of organisation

  • Comments

Results of previous audits:

  • Comments

4.5.1 Performance measurement and monitoring

  • Progressive statistical data:
    Injury/occupational illness/diseases statistics for current and previous 12 months

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Damage statistics for current and previous 12 months

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Environmental incidents for current and previous 12 months

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Non conformance statistics for current and previous 12 months

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Annual consolidation of progressive year's statistics for comparative purposes

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Statistics consolidated and available in graphic format

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Analysis of statistics

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Statistics categorised and analysed to identify trends

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Medical trends for non occupational illness/diseases evaluated to identify possible

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • underlying work/hobby health hazard exposure sources

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • At least an annual report to top management on incident statistic analysis (covers identified risks, increasing/decreasing trends)

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Occupational health variances to form part of statistical data and used for remedial action

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Statistics published and circulated

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Statistical tabled for discussions at SHE committee meetings

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

4.5.1 Performance measurement and monitoring

  • Monitor the SHE performance of employees and the effectiveness of risk control measures

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

4.5.1 Planned job observation

  • Supervisors in possession of up to date JSA/WSWP's

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Supervisors trained in the correct method and purpose of task observations

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Deviation trends analysed and associated system weakness identified and corrected

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

5.6.1 Management Review - General

  • Does top management review the organization's quality management system, at planned intervals, to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Does this review include assessing opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality management system?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Does this review include assessing opportunities for improvement and the need for changes to the quality policy and quality objectives?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Have records from management reviews been maintained (see 4.2.4)

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Comments:

Review input:

  • Does the input to management review include information on results of audits

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • customer feedback?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • process performance and product conformity?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • status of preventive and corrective actions?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • follow-up actions from previous management reviews?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • changes that could affect the quality management system?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • recommendations for improvement?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Comments:

5.6.3 Review Output

  • Does the output from the management review include any decisions and actions related to improvement of the effectiveness of the quality management system and its processes

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • improvement of product related to customer requirements

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • resource needs?

  • 4 - fully implemented and apply 3 - implemented partly elective 2 - implemented / partly implemented -not satisfactory 1 - no evidence of effective application (even if implemented) 0 - not addressed at all

  • Comments:

Closing meeting

  • Attendance register

  • Signing

  • Feedback on deviations and findings

  • Invite questions

Sign off

  • Auditor's signature

  • Site representative and management signature

  • Date and time

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. Any ratings or scores displayed in our Public Library have not been verified by SafetyCulture for accuracy. Users of our platform may provide a rating or score that is incorrect or misleading. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances. You can use our Public Library to search based on criteria such as industry and subject matter. Search results are based on their relevance to your search and other criteria. We may feature checklists based on subject matters we think may be of interest to our customers.