Road Opening Permit Inspection checklist:

• Site of Works:

• Road Opening Permit No:

Works conducted by:

• Contractor/s:

• Contact Telephone No.:

Works Inspected by:

• Council Inspecting Officer/s:

  Select Ian Lochhead Tino Pegoraro Bob Larkin Nathan Hasankolli other

  • Ian Lochhead
  • Tino Pegoraro
  • Bob Larkin
  • Nathan Hasankolli
  • other

• Name:

• Date/Time of Inspection

  Date

Inspection Details:

• Key Words:

  Drainage

  Planning General

  Crossover

  Subdivision

  Service Authority

• Service Authority:

  Gas

  Water

  Power

  Telecommunications

• Works to be inspected under permit:

  Select Preliminaries Vehicle Crossings Indented Parking Bay Drainage Nature Strips Kerb and Channel Road Pavement Footpaths/Shared Paths Completion

  • Preliminaries
  • Vehicle Crossings
  • Indented Parking Bay
  • Drainage
  • Nature Strips
  • Kerb and Channel
  • Road Pavement
  • Footpaths/Shared Paths
  • Completion

Preliminaries:

• Is there a traffic management plan?

  Yes

  No

• Are site conditions in accordance with approved Traffic Management Plan?

  Yes

  No

• Traffic Management Plan in place and approved in accordance with regulations. ✅

• There is an issue with the traffic management plan. Comments:

• There is no traffic management plan required for this job.

• Are there any other site specific requirements to be activated prior to the commencement of any works?

  Yes

  No

• There are no site specific requirements relating to this job.

• Site specific requirements.

• Have the above site specific requirements been met?

  Yes

  No

• Site specific preliminary requirements in place and approved on inspection. ✅

• There is an issue regarding the site specific requirements. Comments:

• Include Comments relating to Road Opening Permit Preliminaries and/or inspection

• Extra notes and comments relating to Road Opening Permit Preliminaries and/or inspection:

• Include photos relating to Road Opening Permit Preliminaries and/or inspection

• Photos:

  Media

Vehicle Crossing

• Type of works on vehicle crossing

  New Vehicle Crossing

  Vehicle Crossing Repair or Widening

• Type of Inspection:

  Pre Pour Inspection

  Mid Pour Inspection

  Post Pour Inspection

  Final Inspection

• Correct layout and positioning of crossing? Check by tape.

  Yes

  No

• 🚫 There is an issue with the layout and positioning of the crossing. Comments:

• Measurement by tape of offsets, crossing and apron widths is approved. ✅

• Excavation depth? Check by tape. (175mm Access Rd, 200mm Link/industrial/commercial Rd)

  175mm

  200mm

• Depth of excavation checked and approved?

  Yes

  No

• Measurement of 175mm deep excavation checked and approved. ✅

• 🚫There are issues with the excavation. Comments:

• Depth of excavation checked and approved?

  Yes

  No

• Measurement of 200mm deep excavation checked and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There are issues with the excavation. Comments:

• Is the correct bedding material being used and compacted in place?

  Yes

  No

• Size 20, Class 2 Crushed Rock bedding is in use and compacted to 75mm. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the bedding material. Comments:

• Visual Inspection of Reinforcement Mesh (Min F72) correctly placed and elevated on bar chairs

  Yes

  No

• Min. F72 Reinforcement Mesh is seen, has been placed correctly and is elevated on bar chairs. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Reinforcement Mesh. Comments:

• Crossing gradient measured by tape and approved?

  Yes

  No

• Crossing Gradients checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the crossing gradient. Comments:

• Correct materials and appropriate placement of expansion joints?

  Yes

  No

• Expansion joint materials and locations inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the expansion joints. Comments:

• Use of dowels to existing kerb & channel seen and approved?

  Yes

  No

• Dowels to existing kerb and channel inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There are issues with dowels to the existing kerb and channel. Comments:

• Inverts installed at correct level with appropriate channel alignment? (Check by tape/string line etc)

  Yes

  No

• Level and line of invert inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the level and/or line of invert. Comments:

• Correct strength (min 25Mpa) of concrete is used and given a light broom finish?

  Yes

  No

• Visual verification of concrete purchased (and/or docket) and light broom finish approved. ✅

• 🚫 There are issues with the concrete purchased or the finish executed. Comments:

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments relating to vehicle crossing and/or inspection:

• Extra notes and comments regarding vehicle crossing and/or inspection:

• Include photos relating to vehicle crossing:

• Photos:

  Media

Indented Parking Bay

• Type of works on indented parking bay:

  New Indented Parking Bay

  Repair of existing indented parking bay

• Type of inspection:

  Pre Pour Inspection

  Mid Pour Inspection

  Post Pour Inspection

  Final Inspection

• Correct set out and positioning of parking bay, offsets and widths? (Check by tape)

  Yes

  No

• Set out and positioning of indented parking bay and all relevant offsets and widths checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the set out and positioning of the indented parking bay. Comments:

• Depth of excavation (175mm) checked and approved?

  Yes

  No

• Depth of 175mm excavation checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the excavation. Comments:

• Measurement by tape of minimum 50mm compacted depth of Size 20, Class 3 crushed rock.

  Yes

  No

• Size 20, Class 3 Crushed Rock bedding is in use and compacted to 50mm. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the bedding material. Comments:

• Min. F72 reinforcement mesh placed correctly and elevated on bar chairs?

  Yes

  No

• Min F72 reinforcement mesh is used, placed correctly and elevated on bar chairs. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the reinforcement mesh. Comments:

• Correct parking bay gradient? (Check by tape)

  Yes

  No

• Gradient and cross fall of parking bay checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the gradient and/or cross fall of the parking bay. Comments:

• Correct materials and appropriate placement of expansion joints?

  Yes

  No

• Expansion joint materials and locations inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the expansion joints. Comments:

• Correct strength (min 25Mpa) of concrete is used and given a light broom finish?

  Yes

  No

• Visual verification of concrete purchased (and/or docket) and light broom finish approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the concrete purchased and/or the Light broom finish. Comments:

• Replacement of adjoining kerb to rollover or layback as required. Approval of kerb type, profile, line and grade?

  Yes

  No

• Replacement of adjoining kerb (to rollover or layback etc, as required) including kerb type, profile, line and grade approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the replacement of adjoining kerb to the existing assets as required. Comments:

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments regarding indented parking bay or inspection

• Extra notes and comments regarding indented parking bay and/or inspection.

• Include photos relating to indented parking bay

• Photos:

  Media

Drainage

• At what stage of works is the inspection being conducted?

  Select Prior to laying pipes Prior to backfill of trenches During backfill of trenches Prior to concrete pour of insitu pits During Installation of pre cast pits At completion of pit works Culvert level prior to backfill and channel alignment on completion Prior to backfill of drainage trenches

  • Prior to laying pipes
  • Prior to backfill of trenches
  • During backfill of trenches
  • Prior to concrete pour of insitu pits
  • During Installation of pre cast pits
  • At completion of pit works
  • Culvert level prior to backfill and channel alignment on completion
  • Prior to backfill of drainage trenches

• Pipe trench excavation: What pipe is the trench being excavated for?

  -1800mm diameter

  +1800mm diameter

  Polyethylene

• Has the trench (rectangular) been excavated to 300mm (x2) + the diameter of the pipe?

  Yes

  No

• The rectangular trench has been appropriately excavated to suit the -1800mm pipe installed. ✅

  Sign

• 🚫 There is an issue with pipe trench excavation. Comments:

• Has the trench (rectangular) been excavated to 400mm (x2) + the diameter of the pipe?

  Yes

  No

• The rectangular trench has been appropriately excavated to suit the +1800mm pipe installed. ✅

  Sign

• 🚫 There is an issue with pipe trench excavation. Comments:

• Has the trench (rectangular) been excavated to 200mm (x2) + the diameter of the pipe?

  Yes

  No

• The rectangular trench has been appropriately excavated to suit the polyethylene pipe installed. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with pipe trench excavation. Comments:

• Are the depth and materials of bedding used appropriate? Check by tape for depth to accord with design and/or standard drawings. Visually inspect bedding materials, looking for 20mm Class 3 FCR (for concrete & fibre reinforcement cement pipes) or 7mm one size aggregate (for U.P.V.C pipes)

  Yes

  No

• The type of bedding materials used for pipes and depth of materials placed accord with what is required in the design and/or standard drawings. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with depth and/or quality of materials used for bedding. Comments:

• Is the drainage pipe used in good condition? Visually inspect for damaged joints or cracks prior to laying.

  Yes

  No

• The drainage pipe being used is in good condition, without damaged joints or cracks. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the condition of drainage pipe being used. Comments:

• 🚫 This inspection is being carried out under the proviso that all of the relevant criteria for drainage inspections prior to the laying of pipes have been met and approved. 🚫

• Are drainage pipes laid true for line and level?

  Yes

  No

• The drainage pipes have been checked for line and level and have been laid true. ✅

• 🚫 The is an issue with the line and/or level of the drainage pipes. Comments:

• Inspect all pipe connections and haunching. Approved?

  Yes

  No

• All pipe connections and haunching have been inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the pipe connections and/or haunching. Comments:

• Inspect jointing methods. Approved?

  Yes

  No

• The jointing methods of pipes installed have been inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the jointing methods used on pipes. Comments:

• 🚫 This inspection is being carried out under the proviso that all of the relevant criteria for drainage inspections prior to the laying of pipes and backfill of trenches have been met and approved. The site is to be inspected at least twice a day during these works. 🚫

• Is the depth of backfill and cover for pipes and the materials used approved? Check depth by tape (to accord with design and/or standard drawings) and visually inspect backfill and compaction of material:<br><br>▪20mm Class 2 crushed rock for trenches under trafficable areas.<br>▪Sand or approved material for other trenches up to Springing Line of pipe, with remainder backfilled with selected material from site<br>▪75mm topsoil cover

  Yes

  No

• The depth of backfill and cover for pipes, plus materials used have all been inspected and approved to meet design and/or standard drawings. A least 2 inspections were carried out throughout the duration of these works. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the depth of backfill and cover for pipes, and/or materials used. Comments:

• 🚫 This inspection is being carried out under the proviso that all of the relevant criteria for drainage inspections prior to the pit installation stage have been met and approved. 🚫

• Is the formwork for pit/s construction (cast insitu pits) set up correctly? Visually inspect to ensure correct thickness is achieved.<br><br>▪Walls - min. 125mm thickness<br>▪Floors - min. 150mm thickness

  Yes

  No

• Pit/s construction formwork has been inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with pit/s construction formwork. Comments:

• 🚫 This inspection is being carried out under the proviso that all of the relevant criteria for drainage inspections prior to the pit installation stage have been met and approved. 🚫

• Visual approval that each pre cast pit segment is not damaged and has a min. 15mm rebate to ensure correct alignment and prevent horizontal movement.

  Yes

  No

• Each pre cast pit segment has met approval of damage inspections and has a min. 15mm rebate, ensuring correct alignment and preventing horizontal movement. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the pre cast pit/s being installed. Comments:

• 🚫 This inspection is being carried out under the proviso that all of the relevant criteria for drainage inspections prior to and during the installation of pits have been met and approved. 🚫

• Is the inside of the pit/s rendered where deemed necessary once formwork is removed?

  Yes

  No

• The inside of the pit/s has been rendered wherever deemed necessary and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the rendering of the inside of the pit/s. comments:

• Is the pit/s greater than 900mm in depth?

  Yes

  No

• Have step irons been installed into the walls without pipe openings? (Where possible)

  Yes

  No

• Do step irons start 500mm below underside of pit/s, with each additional step having a 300mm spacing?

  Yes

  No

• Iron steps have been appropriately installed in all pits deeper than 900mm. ✅

• 🚫 Step irons have been installed into min. 900mm deep pit/s, however there is an issue with there placement. Comments:

• 🚫 There is an issue with the installation of step irons in min. 900mm deep pit/s. Comment:

• The pit/s being installed is less than 900mm in depth. No step irons are required.

• Are pit lids and frames in accordance with council standards?

  Yes

  No

• Pit lid/s and frame/s are in accordance with council standards. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the pit lid/s and/or pit frame/s being installed. Comments:

• 🚫 This inspection is being carried out under the proviso that all of the relevant criteria for drainage inspections to the completion of pit stage have been met and approved. 🚫

• Are the culverts installed approved? Check for line and level, with appropriate channel alignment at entry and exit points.

  Yes

  No

• Culverts installed have been checked for line, level and appropriate channel alignments at entry and exit points. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the culvert/s installed. Comments:

• 🚫 This inspection is being carried out under the proviso that all of the relevant criteria of drainage inspections to the completion of pit stage, along with culvert level prior to backfill and channel alignment on completion have been met and approved. 🚫

• Are house drains connected to drainage works (either front or rear of lot) with 100mm sewer quality UPVC pipe?

  Yes

  No

• 100mm sewer quality UPVC pipe is used to connect house drains to drainage works. Connections have been inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the connection of drainage works to house drains. Comments:

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments regarding drainage and/or inspection:

• Extra notes and comments regarding drainage and/or inspection.

• Include photos regarding drainage and/or inspection:

• Photos:

  Media

Nature Strip

• Type of works on nature strip:

  New nature strip

  Nature strip repair

• Has the nature strip been levelled?

  Yes

  No

• Levelling of nature strip approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the level of the nature strip. Comments:

• Has topsoil been spread to a flush finish with adjoining footpath and kerb?

  Yes

  No

• Topsoil has been spread to a flush finish with adjoining footpaths and kerbs. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the placement of topsoil. Comments:

• Has the area been reseeded if required?

  Yes

  No

• Nature strip has been reseeded as required. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the reseeding of the nature strip. Comments:

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments regarding nature strip and/or inspection:

• Extra notes and comments regarding nature strip and/or inspection.

• Include photos regarding nature strip and/or inspection:

• Photos:

  Media

Kerb and Channel

• Type of works on kerb & channel:

  New kerb and channel

  Kerb and channel repair

• Type of inspection:

  Pre Pour Inspection

  Mid Pour Inspection

  Post Pour Inspection

  Final Inspection

• Kerb & channel base preparation approved? Check by tape the depth below design top of kerb. (Tolerance no greater than 15mm variation to bedding thickness.)

  Yes

  No

• Kerb & channel base preparation has been checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the base preparation. Comments:

• Grade of kerb & channel approved? Check by tape at regular intervals using a string line erected by the contractor.

  Yes

  No

• Grade of kerb & channel preparation checked by tape (with string line) and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the preparation of the grade of kerb & channel. Comments:

• Kerb & channel type and profile approved? Measure using Council specifications template. Tolerance = +/- 7mm

  Yes

  No

• Kerb & channel type is approved within tolerance using Councils specification Template. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the kerb & channel type and/or profile. Comments:

• Concrete strength approved? Min. 25Mph kerb & channel mix. (Check finish and/or purchase docket)

  Yes

  No

• Concrete strength of min. 25Mph kerb & channel mix has been used and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with concrete strength that has been used/ordered. Comments:

• Does the line and finish of the kerb & channel comply with the council standards?

  Yes

  No

• On visual inspection, the kerb & channel complies with the council standards for line and finish. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the line and/or finish of the kerb & channel. Comments:

• Does the job require pit lintels to be installed as a part of the kerb & channel?

  Yes

  No

• Has the lintel/s been installed correctly? Check for the correct line, height and face of lintel.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Pit lintel/s have been checked for line, height and face and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the installation of pit lintel/s. Comments:

• The job does not require the installation of a pit lintel within the kerb & channel.

• Does the job require the installation of a side entry grate/s? (V grates)

  Yes

  No

• Alignment of side entry grate (V grate) approved?

  Yes

  No

• The alignment of the side entry grate/s (V Grate/s) has been checked and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the side entry grate (V Grate). Comments:

• The job does not require the installation of any side entry grates.

• Are there service authority conduits that require location stamps?

  Yes

  No

• Has the kerb & channel been stamped accordingly to denote service locations?

  Yes

  No

• The kerb & channel has been appropriately stamped to show locations of service authority conduits. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the placement of service authority conduit location stamps. Comments:

• There are no requirements for a service authority conduit location stamp.

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments regarding kerb & channel and/or inspection:

• Extra notes and comments regarding kerb & channel and/or inspection.

• Include photos regarding kerb & channel and/or inspection:

• Photos:

  Media

Road Pavement

• At what stage are Road Pavement works during this inspection?

  Sub Grade

  Base Layer

  Sub-Base Layer

  Asphalt Layer

• Is the sub grade excavation approved? Check visually for line and level. Check measurements by tape and string line for correct set out. (Width, level and grade)

  Yes

  No

• The Sub Grade excavation has been visually inspected for line and level, and measured by tape and string line for width, level and grade. The excavation has been approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Sub Grade excavation. Comments:

• Is the Sub Grade preparation approved? Check compaction and adherence to design level using approved vehicle to proof roll the sub grade and string line to check level. (Regular inspections during construction and at completion of Sub Grade level)

  Yes

  No

• The preparation of the Sub Grade, including its compaction and adherence to design level has been regularly checked throughout the construction process and completion, and is approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the preparation of the Sub Grade. Comments:

• Is the installation of Agricultural Drainage approved? Check by tape for depth below sub grade and trench width.

  Yes

  No

• Is the backfill material purchased approved? Visual inspection and/or check purchase docket.

  Yes

  No

• The installation of Agricultural Drainage, including depth below sub grade, trench width and material of backfill is approved. ✅

• 🚫 Agricultural drainage has been set up correctly, however there is an issue with the backfill material. Comments:

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Agricultural Drain. Comments:

• Is the service conduit installation approved? Check by tape for minimum 250mm cover below pavement boxing. (Note: Service authorities also conduct audits for compliance.)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Installation of service conduits has been checked and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the installation of service conduits. Comments:

• If approved, Is this the final inspection of the Sub Grade? (Are the contractors permitted to begin preparing for the Base Layer?)

  Yes

  No

• The Sub Grade hold point has been successfully reached and approved. Contractors have been given permission to begin work on the Base Layer stage. Comments:

• Signed:

  Sign

• The Sub Grade hold point has not been reached as yet. Further inspections of Sub Grade works are required for council approval prior to the contractors beginning any Base Layer works. Comments:

• Signed:

  Sign

• 🚫 Note🚫
  ▪This Base Layer inspection is being conducted under the proviso that the Sub Grade level and all conditions of its preparation, construction and completion have been completed, inspected and approved by council officer/s 🚫

• Approval of Class 3 crushed rock layer compaction and level? ▪Check for correct material. ▪Use approved vehicle to proof roll the rock. ▪ Use a string line to check correct level. (Tolerance +/- 10mm) ▪inspect regularly during construction (eg twice a day) and at completion of Base Layer.

  Yes

  No

• The Base Layer hold point has been successfully reached and approved. The contractors have been given permission to begin preparation for works on the Sub-Base Layer. Comments:

• Signed:

  Sign

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Base Layer. Further inspections are required to achieve councils approval and permission for contractors to begin Sub-Base Layer. Comments:

• Signed:

  Sign

• 🚫 Notes 🚫
  
  ▪This Sub-Base Layer inspection is only being conducted under the proviso that the Base Layer and all conditions of its preparation, construction and completion have been completed, inspected and approved by council officer/s
  
  ▪The Sub-Base Layer can only be commenced after sufficient curing of adjoining kerb & channel and backing up of nature strip to rear of kerb.

• Approval of Class 2 crushed rock layer compaction and level? ▪Check for correct material. ▪Use approved vehicle to proof roll the rock. ▪ Use a string line to check correct level. (Tolerance +/- 10mm) ▪inspect regularly during construction (eg twice a day) and at completion of Sub-Base Layer.

  Yes

  No

• The Class 2 crushed rock layer has been checked and approved for material, compaction (by proof rolling) and level (by string line) ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the materials, compaction and/or level of the Class 2 crushed rock layer. Comments:

• Have trenches under pavement and kerb & channel been backfilled sufficiently with Class 2 fine crushed rock? Check materials and depth of cover.

  Yes

  No

• The backfill of trenches under pavement and kerb & channel has been checked and approved for material and depth. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the materials used and/or depth of materials for backfill of trenches under pavement and/or kerb & channel. Comment:

• If approved, Is this the final inspection of the Sub-Base Layer? (Are the contractors permitted to begin preparing for the Asphalt Layer?)

  Yes

  No

• The Sub-Base Layer hold point has been successfully reached and approved. The contractors have been given permission to begin preparation for works on the Asphalt Layer. ✅ Comments:

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Sub-Base Layer. Further inspections are required to achieve councils approval and permission for contractors to begin Asphalt Layer. Comments:

• 🚫 Notes 🚫
  
  ▪This Asphalt Layer inspection is only being conducted under the proviso that the Sub-Base Layer and all conditions of its preparation, construction and completion have been completed, inspected and approved by council officer/s

• Approval of Tack Coat Application? To be applied when condition between Base Layer and Asphalt Layers is not contaminated. (Area to be cleaned by sweeper of water cart prior to application of tack coat)

  Yes

  No

• The Tack Coat application has been inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Tack Coat application. Comments:

• 🚫 Notes🚫
  ▪Application of asphalt to be during temperatures above 12*C and dry.
  ▪Asphalt temperature to be no less than 120*C.

• Approval of Base Course application? Check material type (purchase docket and/or visual inspection) and finish. Compaction checked by number of passes of roller. (On spot corrective treatment applied as required)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• The Asphalt Base Course application has been inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Asphalt Base Course. Comments:

• Approval of Wearing Course application? Check material type (purchase docket and/or visual inspection) and finish. Compaction checked by number of passes of roller.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• The Asphalt Wearing Course application has been inspected and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Asphalt Wearing Course. Comments:

• Is the Asphalt Layer application completed and approved?

  Yes

  No

• The Asphalt Layer has been completed, inspected and approved. ✅ Comments:

• Signed:

  Sign

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Asphalt Layer. Further inspections are required to achieve councils approval and permission for contractors to complete Road Pavement. Comments:

• Signed:

  Sign

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments regarding kerb & channel and/or inspection:

• Extra notes and comments regarding kerb & channel and/or inspection.

• Include photos regarding kerb & channel and/or inspection:

• Photos:

  Media

Footpaths/Shared Paths

• Type of works on footpath/shared path:

  new footpath/shared path

  Footpath/shared path repair

• Type of inspection:

  Pre Pour Inspection

  Mid Pour Inspection

  Post Pour Inspection

  Final Inspection

• Is the preparation of the path sufficient? (Check boxing for correct alignment, level and position of any vehicle crossings. Measure width of path to design and Knox standards, grade and cross fall to DDA compliance)

  Yes

  No

• The preparation of the path has been checked and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the preparation of the path. Comments:

• Are there any requirements for consideration of a tree root management system? (Consider path realignment, level alteration, root barriers or alternate pavement material where tree roots are prevalent.)

  Yes

  No

• 🚫 There may be cause to consider a tree root management plan. Comments:

• There is no requirements for a tree root management plan.

• What material is the path to be constructed from?

  Concrete

  Asphalt

  Granitic Sand

• What type of path is being constructed? Local & Key Paths - (100mm concrete, 50mm FCR Class 3) or Commercial, Industrial, Reserves, Shared Paths - (125mm concrete, 100mm FCR Class 3)

  Local & Key Paths

  Commercial/Industrial/Reserves/Shared Paths

• Is the base of the path sufficient? (Check by tape for 100mm concrete, 50mm FCR Class 3)

  Yes

  No

• The base of the concrete path (100mm concrete, 50mm FCR Class 3) has been checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the base of the concrete path. Comments:

• Is the base of the path sufficient? (Check by tape for 125mm concrete, 100mm FCR Class 3)

  Yes

  No

• The base of the concrete path (125mm concrete, 100mm FCR Class 3) has been checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the base of the concrete path. Comments:

• Visual inspection of Min. F72 Reinforcement Mesh correctly placed and elevated on bar chairs?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Min. F72 Reinforcement Mesh has been used, placed correctly and elevated on bar chairs. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue regarding Reinforcement Mesh. Comments:

• Is contractor using Min. 25MPa concrete strength (check purchase docket and/or finish) with a light broom finish and no highlights?

  Yes

  No

• Min. 25MPa concrete strength has been used with a light broom finish and no highlights. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the concrete strength and/or finish. Comments:

• Are expansion joint spacings to standards? (Check for in between 125mm and 100mm concrete footpath bays, in between private property and council assets and every 8 metres of concrete bays)

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Expansion joint positions have been checked and approved to standard. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the expansion joints and/or their positioning. Comments:

• Does Tactile paving meet DDA compliance standards?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Tactile paving meets the standards required for DDA compliance. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Tactile paving. Comments:

• Is the base of the path sufficient? (Check by tape for 35mm asphalt, 150mm FCR Class 3)

  Yes

  No

• The base of the asphalt path (35mm asphalt, 150mm FCR Class 3) has been checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the base of the asphalt path. Comments:

• Is the base of the path sufficient? (Check by tape for 50mm Granitic Sand, 100mm compacted depth of FCR Class 3)

  Yes

  No

• The base of the Granitic Sand Paths (50mm Granitic Sand, 100mm compacted depth of FCR Class 3) has been checked by tape and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the base of the Granitic Sand Paths. Comments:

• Is there a Pram Crossing/s being poured as part of the job?

  Yes

  No

• Are measurements of the Pram Crossing to standard and a visual inspection of the crossing and crossing materials approved? (Check for Min. F72 Reinforcement Mesh, min. 25MPa Concrete strength, correct expansion and contraction joint spacing, tactile paving to DDA standards etc)

  Yes

  No

• Visual inspection of Pram Crossing/s, materials used and measurement to council standards are approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the Pram Crossing/s at the job. Comments:

• There are no Pram Crossings to be poured as a part of the job.

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments regarding Footpaths/Shared Paths and/or inspection:

• Extra notes and comments regarding Footpaths/Shared Paths and/or inspection.

• Include photos regarding Footpaths/Shared Paths and/or inspection:

• Photos:

  Media

Completion

• Is signage placed at and around the siteapproved? Check for location, size and wording.

  Yes

  No

• The location, size and wording of signage at the site is sufficient. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with signage at the job. Comments:

• Has the site been appropriately reinstated? Check for reinstatement to pre construction condition, including clean up.

  Yes

  No

• The reinstatement and clean up of the site has been checked and approved. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the standard of reinstatement and/or clean up of the site. Comments:

• Has a bond been withheld in relation to works on the site?

  Yes

  No

• Have the specific conditions of bond been adhered to?

  Yes

  No

• The specific conditions of a bond have been adhered to. The bond can be released. ✅

• 🚫 There is an issue with the compliance of specific conditions to a bond. Comments:

• There has been no bond withheld in relation to this site.

• Are there any site specific requirements?

  Yes

  No

• Site Specific Requirements and comments:

• There are no site specific requirements to be considered in this inspection.

• Include any extra comments regarding completion and/or inspection:

• Extra notes and comments regarding completion and/or inspection.

• Include photos regarding completion and/or inspection:

• Photos:

  Media