Information

SIte Audit Checklist

  • Conducted on

  • Lack Group T/a K&D Traffic Management Pty Ltd Supervisor:

  • Site Supervisor or Client Contact:-

  • Client:-

  • Project:

  • TCP No.

  • Location:
  • Duration of work.

  • Road Configuration:

SECTION 1 - WORKPLACE HEALTH & SAFETY (WH&S)

  • Rate in the following manner: Yes (conforms) No (non conformance) or Not Applicable (N/A)

Part 1. Traffic Control Plan (TCP)

  • 1.1 Does the work require a:-

  • A Traffic Management Plan (TMP)?

  • A Traffic Control Plan (TCP)?

  • A Vehicle Control Plan (VMP)?

  • A Pedestrian Management Plan (PMP)?

  • 1.2 Are all required plans approved?

  • 1.3 Is the approved TCP on site?

  • 1.4 Have signs and devices been set up as in the TCP?

  • 1.5 If modifications been made, are they approved and marked on the plan by an appropriately ticketed person. (Transport and Main Roads [TMR] 3 Traffic Management)?

  • 1.6 Has a Site Specific Risk Assessment (SSRA) been done?

  • 1.7. Is the TCP relevant for the works in progress?

  • 1.8. Has a permit been issued by Local Council or Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) and is it being complied <br> with?

  • 1.9. Is the permit held onsite?

  • 1.11 Are the requirements implemented for safe clearances to workers and pedestrians and traffic approach speeds?<br>

  • Additional draw plans by inspecting person.

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 2. Roadwork Speed Zones (RSZ)

  • 2.1 Are records being kept regarding the times of the signage installation?

  • 2.2 Where a Speed Zone is in place, is the limit appropriate for the work being undertaken? TCWS section 8.2.3

  • 2.3 Is the speed limit/s operating within the approved times listed on the permit?

  • 2.4 Is the length of the speed zone as per the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - part 3 Works on Roads?

  • 2.5 Are Advanced Speed Warning Signs used appropriately?

  • 2.6 Are speed signs duplicated at the start of the speed zone? This is dependent on the SSRA.

  • 2.7 Are speed signs the correct size?

  • 2.8 Are all signs installed at the correct spacing?

  • 2.9 Are all signs installed at the correct height?

  • 2.10 Have fixed speed signs and pavement markings been covered/removed?

  • 2.11 Are repeater signs installed if required?

  • 2.16 At the end of the work, has has the fixed speed limit been reinstated?

  • 2.13 Are signs covered adequately when not in use?

  • 2.14 Other comments.

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 3. Record Keeping (Pre-starts, Site Specific Risk Assessments etc)

  • 3.1 Are records being kept for roadwork speed zones?

  • 3.2 Is there a completed SWMS signed by employees on site?

  • 3.3 Is it the correct version?

  • 3.4 Has the Site Specific Risk Assessment been completed?

  • 3.5 Is there a completed signage check?

  • 3.6. Does the TC Supervisor have blank incident report forms?

  • 3.7 Other comments.

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 4. Traffic Controllers (TC's)

  • 4.1 Are Traffic Controllers (TC's) being used?

  • 4.2 Are the correct number of TC'S being used?

  • 4.3 Have TC certificates been sighted and the numbers and expiry date recorded

  • 4.3A. General Construction Card<br> <br>

  • 4.3B. Traffic Controller Accreditation Cards?

  • 4.3C. Level 2 Traffic Management Card?

  • 4.4 Is TC's hi-viz clothing in good repair?

  • 4.5 Are all TC's wearing the correct PPE?

  • 4.6 Is the traffic speed restricted to a max of 60km/h?

  • 4.7 Is the sight distance to approaching traffic D or greater, as per the plan?

  • 4.8 Do TC's have a clear escape route?

  • 4.9. Are TC's able to communicate with each other (line of sight, two way radios, additional TC's)?

  • 4.10 Are the 'Prepare to Stop' and 'Traffic Controller Ahead', signs correctly displayed?<br>

  • 4.11. Are the above signs covered or removed when not required?

  • 4.12. Are they controlling traffic in accordance with Traffic Controller Accreditation Scheme - Approved Procedure (TCASAP)?

  • 4.13. If TC's are being used for night work:-

  • a. Are they wearing approved clothing?

  • b. Are they safely lit and visible?

  • c. Do they have correct communication?

  • d. Are they using lighted wands?

  • 4.14. If the work is conducted at night are all requirements being met?

  • 4.15. For intermittent work are all requirements met?

  • 4.16. Other comments

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 5: Portable Traffic Signals (PTS)

  • ARE PORTABLE TRAFFIC LIGHTS BEING USED?<br>(If "NO" then go to Section 6)

  • 5.1 Are PTS being used?

  • 5.2 Where PTS are being used, are they being used as per the issued permit?

  • 5.3 Are the PTS being used marked as complying with TMR specifications? <br><br><br><br><br><br>

  • 5.4 Are the PTS correctly registered?

  • 5.5 Is the approach speed of traffic reduced to 60km/h or less?

  • 5.6 Is minimum sight distance of 150 m provided?

  • 5.7 Are the PTS correctly sighted and established?

  • 5.8 Has a Holding Line been marked on the roadway?

  • 5.9 Are procedures in place to review the end- of-queue when PTS are operating?

  • 5.10 Have all signs associated with PTS been erected correctly?

  • 5.11 Other comments:-

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 6. Flashing Arrow Sign (FAS)

  • ARE FLASHING ARROW SIGN BEING USED?<br>(If "NO" then go to Section 7)

  • 6.1 Is a FAS being used?

  • 6.2 Is the FAS being used Marked as complying with MUTCD Specifications?

  • 6.3 Is it located correctly?

  • 6.4 Is it the correct size sign?

  • 6.5 Is the correct Mode of Operation being used?

  • 6.6 If lane status signs are being used in conjunction with FAS, is the message to the motorist the same?

  • 6.7 Other comments:

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 7. Variable Message Sign. (VMS)

  • IS VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGN (VMS) BEING USED?<br>(If "NO" then go to Section 8)

  • 7.1 Is a variable message sign being used as specified in MUTCD?

  • 7.2 Is the message relative to the works being undertaken?

  • 7.3 Are there less than four (4) words per screen and no more that two (2) screens on display?

  • 7.4 Is the sign located in a safe position?

  • 7.5. Other comments:

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 8. Safety Barriers

  • ARE SAFETY BARRIERS BEING USED?<br>

  • 8.1 Are safety barriers installed correctly?

  • 8.2 Have the correct barriers been installed?

  • 8.3 Where barrier sections are used as safety Safety Barriers, are they in compliance with speed zone?

  • 8.4 Where non rigid barriers are used as safety barriers, is work behind the barriers outside the 1.5 metre deflection zone?

  • 8.5 Are water filled safety barrier elements full of water and NO leaks evident?

  • 8.6 Is the safety barrier erected as designed?

  • 8.7 Has the approach speed of traffic been reduced to the barrier design rating?

  • 8.8 Other comments:

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 9. Signs and Devices

  • 9.1 Are all signs and devices in good condition?

  • 9.2 Are the signs clearly visible and not affected by other signs, plant items, vegetation, shade, light glare etc?

  • 9.3 Are sign faces in compliance with The MUTCD and have Class 1W retro reflective sheeting?

  • 9.4 Are the correct sign sizes being used?

  • 9.5 Are signs duplicated, where required?

  • 9.6 Are signs erected at the correct height and position?

  • 9.7 Are the signs erected to give the correct sight distance?

  • 9.8 Are delineators facing with the flow of traffic?

  • 9.9 Are there any conflicting signs, devices or markings?

  • 9.10. Have the needs of pedestrians been provided for?

  • 9.11 Have the needs of cyclists been provided for?

  • 9.12. Are all properties accesses (residential & business) to the site controlled?

  • 9.13. Are all cones and bollards installed at the correct spacing?

  • 9.14. Ae the correct sized cones and bollards being used?

  • 9.15. Where tapers are used, have they been identified as 'Lateral Shift' or 'Merge' tapers?

  • Are the tapers the correct length?

  • 9.17 Where there are three (3) lanes of traffic or more in one direction, and two lanes are closed, are the separate merge tapers of the correct length?<br>

  • 9.17. Are the tapers separated by at least D or 2D?

  • 9.18. Where work is beyond a crest, curve or intersection, has the taper been set up before the crest, curve or intersection to allow for the safe approach of vehicles through the worksite?

  • 9.19. Are temporary walkways a minimum of 1.2 metres with wheelchair access?

  • 9.20. Other comments:

  • Additional draw plans by inspecting person.

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 10 End-Of-Queue

  • 10.1. Has an assessment of expected queue length been undertaken/documented?

  • 10.2. Has protection been provided where the end-of-queue is likely to be within'D' of the first downstream PTS sign?

  • 10.3. Is a sight distance between approaching motorists and the end-of-queue, being maintained at greater than '2D' (open road areas) and '1.5D' (built up areas)?

  • 10.4 Where the first PTS sign is more than '4D' from the control point, are 'Repeater Signs' placed at intervals of NOT more than '4D'?

  • 10.5. Is the traffic queue monitored at all times during the course of the work?

  • 10.6. Other Comments:-

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

Part 11. Workers on Foot Near Plant

  • 11.1 Have workers working within 3 meters of plant, been trained/briefed/tool-boxed as per the Lack Group, Traffic Management, Safe Work Method Statement?

  • 11.2 Where workers are working close to revolving plant, are satisfactory risk controls in place?

  • 11.3. Are spotters being used near reversing plant or delivery vehicles?

  • 11.4. Where a spotter is used, are all requirements being used?

  • 11.5 Where travelling plant or vehicles travel slower than 20Km/h below the normal road speed limit, do they comply with the requirements of the MUTCD?

  • 11.6. For mobile work, are all requirements being met?

  • 11.7. Other Comments:-

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

  • Additional draw plans by inspecting person.

  • Lack Group t/as K&D Traffic Management Pty Ltd Supervisor.

  • Site Supervisor or Authorized Representative.

SECTION 2 - ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MONITORING

  • Rate in the following manner: Yes (safe) No (at risk) [non conformance] or Not Applicable (N/A)

  • ON SITE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS MUST NOT BE INTERFERED WITH DURING INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF TRAFFIC GUIDANCE SCHEMES OR DURING GENERAL COMMUTING THROUGHOUT THE WORK SITE.
    HAVE THE FOLLOWING CONTROLS BEEN AFFECTED BY LACK GROUP t/as K&D TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PTY LTD OPERATIONS?
    IF SO! HAVE THEY BEEN REPORTED TO THE ONSITE &/OR LACK GROUP WHS&E MANAGER.

Part 12. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL

  • 12.1 Pavement and road surfaces are free of spoil and other eroding materials?<br> (traffic control vehicle movements from road shoulder to road pavement surface)

  • 12.2. Plant/equipment (including truck tyres & plant tracks) cleaned before leaving site?

  • 12.3 Are plant and equipment movements on surfaces that are susceptible to erosion, limited?

WATER CONTROL AND GROUND WATER

  • 12.4 Is plant & equipment inspected for leaks of fuel, oil or hydraulic fluid? ( The vehicle checklist is in the Traffic Controllers

  • 12.5. Is there any evidence of waste disposal to storm water, sewer, drainage lines, water courses and/or water bodies?

AIR QUALITY (OBJECTIVE: to avoid dust and/or odour complaints)

  • 12.6. Are areas adjacent to worksite free of soil and dust?

  • 12.7. Are plant and equipment movements limited on surfaces susceptible to dust generation?

  • 12.8. Are loads covered and secured prior to leaving site?

  • 12.9. Site swept clean prior to leaving?

WASTE MANAGEMENT (OBJECTIVE: to reduce waste generation and ensure the safe and responsible disposal of waste)

  • 12.10. Is the worksite free of litter?

  • 12.11. Is all litter taken away at the end of the shift and placed in the relevant waste receptacles?

NOISE and VIBRATION. (OBJECTIVE: to avoid noise and/or vibration complaints)

  • 12.12. Are plant and/or equipment engines are enclosed and mufflers are in place on traffic control vehicles, lighting towers?

  • 12.13. Is any work taking place on Sundays or Public Holidays? ( out of hours work permitted as per clients permit)

  • 12.14 No noisy works, deliveries or communications outside allowable times. (as per clients permit)

BIODIVERSITY

  • 12.15 No equipment or materials is placed on native vegetation outside worksites or within drip lines of trees.

ENERGY and GREENHOUSE (OBJECTIVE: to maximise the efficient use of energy and resources)

  • 12.16. Is plant and equipment well maintained?

  • 12.17. Is plant and equipment not left idling when not in use?

HERITAGE (OBJECTIVE: to minimise community and environmental impacts during delivery)

  • 12.19. Ensure no disturbance or damage to heritage items.

SITE RESTORATION (OBJECTIVE: to minimise community and environmental impact during delivery)

  • 12.20. Any evidence of structural damage to adjacent property/properties that is/are attributable to Lack Group t/as K&D Traffic Management Pty Ltd traffic control work?

  • ALL NON CONFORMANCES AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE TO BE NOTED ON SEPARATE "NON CONFORMANCE-CORRECTIVE ACTION-PREVENTIVE ACTION REPORT" [IMS-FM-SAF-013-RO. Revision Date: 28.06.12]

  • Lack Group t/as K&D Traffic Management Pty Ltd Supervisor:

  • Site Supervisor:

Information

  • Document Reference: IMS-FM-SAF-038-R0 Revision Date: 15.03.2013

  • ABN: 43 123 149 539.

  • "Uncontrolled document when printed"

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.