Title Page

  • Site conducted

  • Document No.

  • Audit Title

  • Picture of the Item

  • Conducted on

  • Prepared by

  • Personnel

Compliance

  • Is the product under audit listed in the capabilities register? Ref - Exp 1.8 Appendix 1

  • Picture of Item under audit

  • Description of item.

  • is the exposition available to the staff member? Ref - Exp 1.11.1 & 3.1.3

  • Describe why was the Exposition unavailable.

System, process and product

Receipt and PO

  • Has the receipt inspection been carried out IAW the exposition in relation to this product? Ref - Exp 2.2.1

  • Customer RO matches the component

  • Picture of Repair Order.

  • Description of incorrect info on RO

  • Clear scope of maintenance required is stated on the RO

  • Picture of Repair Order.

  • Description of Scope

  • The RO states the approved data & revision status of the maintenance data to be used. (Note: This may be covered by the SLA)

  • Picture of Repair Order

  • Description of CMM info

  • Does the component have obvious damage/missing parts.

  • Add media

  • Description of damage/missing parts.

Customer supplied parts

  • Have any customer supplied parts been received for inclusion into the product? Ref - Exp 2.2.6

  • Has the receipt inspection carried out.

  • Description of why the receipt inspection was not carried out.

  • Has the correct documentation has been supplied by the customer.

  • Picture of supplied documentation.

  • Description of supplied documentation

  • Records of customer GRN in the BLI are evident.

  • Description

  • Have the parts been stored & labelled appropriately?

  • Picture of part storage/label

  • Description

Shelf life limited Items used or incorporated into the product

  • Have any Shelf life limited Items been used in the maintenace of; or incorporated into the product? Ref - Exp 2.3.5

  • Were the Shelf life limited Items used, in the maintenance of; or incorporated into the product, within their listed shelf life at the time of their use or incorporation? Ref - Exp 2.3.5

  • Photographic evidence of expired product used

  • Have the removed parts been disposed of appropriately? Ref - Exp 2.3.8

  • Photographic evidence of incorrect disposal method.

Use of calibrated tooling by employees.

  • Was any calibrated tooling used in the course of the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.6

  • Is the equipment within it's recorded calibration interval at the time of its use? Ref - Exp 2.6.1

  • Photographic evidence of out of date calibration.

  • undefined

  • Were GSE items such as benches, assembly platforms and cages in serviceable condition and if applicable, inspected within the scheduled time period? Ref - Exp 2.6.4

  • Photographic evidence of condition of work surfaces and or GSE including inspection tags if applicable.

  • Description

Cleanliness of maintenance facility

  • Is the work area tidy? Ref - Exp 2.7

  • Photographic evidence of cleanliness of work space

  • Is the product free from contaminants? Ref - Exp 2.7.2

  • Add media

  • Is there sufficient room to carry out the required maintenance?

  • Photographic evidence of space available for maintenance.

  • Is the segregation of activities adequate? Ref - Exp 2.7.3

  • Photographic evidence of segregation of activities.

  • Are hazardous waste materials disposed of IAW DER guidelines? Ref - Exp 2.7.4

  • undefined

Current Maintenance Data

  • Does the technician have access to controlled maintenance data (CMM)? Note the current revision & check against the CDB. Ref - Exp 2.8

  • undefined

  • Does the BLI reflect the current maintenance data? Ref - Exp 2.8.4

  • undefined

  • photographic evidence of controlled data reference in BLI

  • Are any engineering orders necessary to carry out the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.8.6

  • Does the technician have access to the engineering order?

  • photographic evidence of engineering order.

  • Why was Technician unable to access the EO

  • Is the Engineering Order current?

  • Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting perceived errors in the maintenance data

  • Name of technician interviewed.

Airworthiness Directives.

  • Has the customer identified any Airworthiness Directive requirements in their RO? Ref - Exp 2.10

  • Description

  • pic of AWD

Maintenance documentation/CRS.

  • Note the current revision of the BLI and check it against the CDB. Ref - Exp 2.12

  • Is the technicians copy of the BLI the latest version as recorded in the CDB? Ref - Exp 2.12.3, 2.12.7 & 3.1.4

  • Describe why the BLI in use is wrong.

  • Is the technician aware of the precedence of the approved data over the BLI? Ref - Exp 2.12.3 & 3.1.4

  • Has block 1 (release for maintenance) been signed by an approved person? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.1

  • photographic evidence of the completion of block 1.

  • Task Handovers.<br>Are block 2 (stage of maintenance completions) signed and up to date? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.2 & 2.25.1

  • photographic evidence of the completion of block 2.

  • Has block 3 (records of component replacements and unserviceabilities) been correctly filled out? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.3

  • photographic evidence of the completion of block 3.

  • Has a calibrated tool been used in the course of the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.6

  • Pic of the calibrated tooling used.

  • Has this been recorded in Block 3 of the BLI? Ref - Exp 2.12.9

  • Pic of Block record of Calibrated items

  • Description

  • Is the tool within it's re-calibration date.

  • Pic of out of CAL sticker

  • Description

  • Has block 4 (Final inspection certification) been completed by an authorised person? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.4, 2.15.2/3/9 & 3.5

  • photographic evidence of the completion of block 4 by an authorised person.

  • Is the maintenance complete? Ref - Exp 2.15 to 2.16

  • Photographic evidence of the completion of maintenance.

  • Is a CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report required for this type of maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.15

  • Is the signatory, to the CASA form 1 and/or report, authorised to Release to Service?

  • photographic evidence of the completion of CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report by an authorised employee.

  • Has the maintenance been carried out IAW CASA Part 42 and Part 145? Ref - Exp 2.15.2

  • Explain the nature of the failure to carry out maintenance IAW the above regulations.

  • In the opinion of the subject matter expert below, is the product serviceable?

  • Name of subject matter expert.

Records for the operator.

  • Has the documentation been made available to the operator? Ref - Exp 2.16

  • description of why documentation is not supplied.

  • Are other records ie. EO's, SB's, AD's, and lifed items supplied if required?

  • In the course of maintenance, were any major defects, or suspected unapproved parts identified? Ref - Exp 2.17/18

  • Were the major defects and/or suspected unapproved parts handled IAW the exposition? Ref - Exp 2.17/18

  • Description of what was not conducted.

Use of external Contractors

  • Has any part of the required maintenance been subcontracted to another person or organisation? Ref - Exp 2.19

  • Was this captured by the use of a form 23 Request for subcontracted maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.19.1

  • Photographic evidence of the use of form 23.

  • Explanation of the failure to use form 23.

Maintenance Errors

  • Were any maintenance errors detected during stage of maintenance inspections or during final inspections? Ref - Exp 2.24

  • Photographic evidence of errors found during stage of maintenance or final inspections.

  • Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting suspected maintenance errors? Ref - Exp 2.24.2

  • Name of technician interviewed.

Time to Complete maintenance

  • Did the technician have sufficient time to complete the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.27

  • Explanation of time restriction.

  • Alternatively has the product overstayed its welcome? Ref - Exp 2.27

  • Explanation why item has not been returned to the Operator

Technician Authority / Training

  • Is the technicians RTE available? Ref - Exp 3.6.1

  • Is the technician authorised to carry out the required maintenance? 3.6.2/3

  • Description

  • Are the technician's periodic authorisations up to date? Ref - Exp 3.6.3

  • Photographic evidence of currency of periodic authorisations.

  • Is the technicians DAMP and Human Factors training current? Ref - Exp 3.9

  • Photographic evidence of currency of DAMP and Human Factors training.

Competence Assessment

  • With the help of a Supervisor or the Responsible Manager the Q&SM may, utilizing a checklist use this opportunity to reauthorise or revoke the technician approval.

  • Are the technicians approvals being reviewed?

  • Name of supervisor or Responsible Manager.

  • Name of employee.

  • Photographic evidence of competence assessment.

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.