Title Page
-
Site conducted
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Picture of the Item
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Personnel
Compliance
-
Is the product under audit listed in the capabilities register? Ref - Exp 1.8 Appendix 1
-
Picture of Item under audit
-
Description of item.
-
is the exposition available to the staff member? Ref - Exp 1.11.1 & 3.1.3
-
Describe why was the Exposition unavailable.
System, process and product
Receipt and PO
-
Has the receipt inspection been carried out IAW the exposition in relation to this product? Ref - Exp 2.2.1
-
Customer RO matches the component
-
Picture of Repair Order.
-
Description of incorrect info on RO
-
Clear scope of maintenance required is stated on the RO
-
Picture of Repair Order.
-
Description of Scope
-
The RO states the approved data & revision status of the maintenance data to be used. (Note: This may be covered by the SLA)
-
Picture of Repair Order
-
Description of CMM info
-
Does the component have obvious damage/missing parts.
-
Add media
-
Description of damage/missing parts.
Customer supplied parts
-
Have any customer supplied parts been received for inclusion into the product? Ref - Exp 2.2.6
-
Has the receipt inspection carried out.
-
Description of why the receipt inspection was not carried out.
-
Has the correct documentation has been supplied by the customer.
-
Picture of supplied documentation.
-
Description of supplied documentation
-
Records of customer GRN in the BLI are evident.
-
Description
-
Have the parts been stored & labelled appropriately?
-
Picture of part storage/label
-
Description
Shelf life limited Items used or incorporated into the product
-
Have any Shelf life limited Items been used in the maintenace of; or incorporated into the product? Ref - Exp 2.3.5
-
Were the Shelf life limited Items used, in the maintenance of; or incorporated into the product, within their listed shelf life at the time of their use or incorporation? Ref - Exp 2.3.5
-
Photographic evidence of expired product used
-
Have the removed parts been disposed of appropriately? Ref - Exp 2.3.8
-
Photographic evidence of incorrect disposal method.
Use of calibrated tooling by employees.
-
Was any calibrated tooling used in the course of the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.6
-
Is the equipment within it's recorded calibration interval at the time of its use? Ref - Exp 2.6.1
-
Photographic evidence of out of date calibration.
-
undefined
-
Were GSE items such as benches, assembly platforms and cages in serviceable condition and if applicable, inspected within the scheduled time period? Ref - Exp 2.6.4
-
Photographic evidence of condition of work surfaces and or GSE including inspection tags if applicable.
-
Description
Cleanliness of maintenance facility
-
Is the work area tidy? Ref - Exp 2.7
-
Photographic evidence of cleanliness of work space
-
Is the product free from contaminants? Ref - Exp 2.7.2
-
Add media
-
Is there sufficient room to carry out the required maintenance?
-
Photographic evidence of space available for maintenance.
-
Is the segregation of activities adequate? Ref - Exp 2.7.3
-
Photographic evidence of segregation of activities.
-
Are hazardous waste materials disposed of IAW DER guidelines? Ref - Exp 2.7.4
-
undefined
Current Maintenance Data
-
Does the technician have access to controlled maintenance data (CMM)? Note the current revision & check against the CDB. Ref - Exp 2.8
-
undefined
-
Does the BLI reflect the current maintenance data? Ref - Exp 2.8.4
-
undefined
-
photographic evidence of controlled data reference in BLI
-
Are any engineering orders necessary to carry out the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.8.6
-
Does the technician have access to the engineering order?
-
photographic evidence of engineering order.
-
Why was Technician unable to access the EO
-
Is the Engineering Order current?
-
Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting perceived errors in the maintenance data
-
Name of technician interviewed.
Airworthiness Directives.
-
Has the customer identified any Airworthiness Directive requirements in their RO? Ref - Exp 2.10
-
Description
-
pic of AWD
Maintenance documentation/CRS.
-
Note the current revision of the BLI and check it against the CDB. Ref - Exp 2.12
-
Is the technicians copy of the BLI the latest version as recorded in the CDB? Ref - Exp 2.12.3, 2.12.7 & 3.1.4
-
Describe why the BLI in use is wrong.
-
Is the technician aware of the precedence of the approved data over the BLI? Ref - Exp 2.12.3 & 3.1.4
-
Has block 1 (release for maintenance) been signed by an approved person? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.1
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 1.
-
Task Handovers.<br>Are block 2 (stage of maintenance completions) signed and up to date? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.2 & 2.25.1
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 2.
-
Has block 3 (records of component replacements and unserviceabilities) been correctly filled out? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.3
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 3.
-
Has a calibrated tool been used in the course of the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.6
-
Pic of the calibrated tooling used.
-
Has this been recorded in Block 3 of the BLI? Ref - Exp 2.12.9
-
Pic of Block record of Calibrated items
-
Description
-
Is the tool within it's re-calibration date.
-
Pic of out of CAL sticker
-
Description
-
Has block 4 (Final inspection certification) been completed by an authorised person? Ref - Exp 2.12.5.4, 2.15.2/3/9 & 3.5
-
photographic evidence of the completion of block 4 by an authorised person.
-
Is the maintenance complete? Ref - Exp 2.15 to 2.16
-
Photographic evidence of the completion of maintenance.
-
Is a CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report required for this type of maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.15
-
Is the signatory, to the CASA form 1 and/or report, authorised to Release to Service?
-
photographic evidence of the completion of CASA form 1 and/or ANDI report by an authorised employee.
-
Has the maintenance been carried out IAW CASA Part 42 and Part 145? Ref - Exp 2.15.2
-
Explain the nature of the failure to carry out maintenance IAW the above regulations.
-
In the opinion of the subject matter expert below, is the product serviceable?
-
Name of subject matter expert.
Records for the operator.
-
Has the documentation been made available to the operator? Ref - Exp 2.16
-
description of why documentation is not supplied.
-
Are other records ie. EO's, SB's, AD's, and lifed items supplied if required?
-
In the course of maintenance, were any major defects, or suspected unapproved parts identified? Ref - Exp 2.17/18
-
Were the major defects and/or suspected unapproved parts handled IAW the exposition? Ref - Exp 2.17/18
-
Description of what was not conducted.
Use of external Contractors
-
Has any part of the required maintenance been subcontracted to another person or organisation? Ref - Exp 2.19
-
Was this captured by the use of a form 23 Request for subcontracted maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.19.1
-
Photographic evidence of the use of form 23.
-
Explanation of the failure to use form 23.
Maintenance Errors
-
Were any maintenance errors detected during stage of maintenance inspections or during final inspections? Ref - Exp 2.24
-
Photographic evidence of errors found during stage of maintenance or final inspections.
-
Is the technician aware of the procedure for reporting suspected maintenance errors? Ref - Exp 2.24.2
-
Name of technician interviewed.
Time to Complete maintenance
-
Did the technician have sufficient time to complete the required maintenance? Ref - Exp 2.27
-
Explanation of time restriction.
-
Alternatively has the product overstayed its welcome? Ref - Exp 2.27
-
Explanation why item has not been returned to the Operator
Technician Authority / Training
-
Is the technicians RTE available? Ref - Exp 3.6.1
-
Is the technician authorised to carry out the required maintenance? 3.6.2/3
-
Description
-
Are the technician's periodic authorisations up to date? Ref - Exp 3.6.3
-
Photographic evidence of currency of periodic authorisations.
-
Is the technicians DAMP and Human Factors training current? Ref - Exp 3.9
-
Photographic evidence of currency of DAMP and Human Factors training.
Competence Assessment
-
With the help of a Supervisor or the Responsible Manager the Q&SM may, utilizing a checklist use this opportunity to reauthorise or revoke the technician approval.
-
Are the technicians approvals being reviewed?
-
Name of supervisor or Responsible Manager.
-
Name of employee.
-
Photographic evidence of competence assessment.