Information

  • Document No.

  • Field Supervisor

  • CH Unit #

  • Operator 1

  • Operator 2

  • Other

  • Customer

  • LSD

  • Services

  • Other Services Run

  • Conducted on

  • Auditor

  • Location

Pre-Departure, Job Planning and Arrival

  • Were all downhole tools checked before leaving the shop?

  • Were the surface computer, depth, and weight systems checked before leaving the shop?

  • Did the logger and pickup arrive 30 minutes early?

  • Was Dispatch contacted with estimated time to rig up?

  • Were the job requirements discussed with the well site rep?

  • Were all zones of interest obtained from the well site rep?

  • Were any difficult hole conditions identified/discussed with client?

Pre-Job Well Site Preparation

  • Was the FLRA form completed with all TES personnel prior to commencing operations?

  • Comments

  • Was the surface equipment checked before rig up?

  • Comments

  • Was the cable continuity/insulation checked before rig up?

  • Comments

  • Were all down hole tools checked before rig up?

  • Comments

  • Were the tool serial numbers visually confirmed and the calibrations verified by the Field Supervisor?

  • Comments

  • Explosives and/or Radiation warning signs posted at lease entrance?

  • Comments

  • Ground cables connected to well head and checked for stray voltage?

  • Comments

  • Are all tool calibrations current?

  • Comments

  • Was all appropriate running gear (centralizers, knuckles, etc.) utilized?

  • Comments

  • Was an offset log or Open Hole log downloaded?

  • Was an offset log or Open Hole log obtained at the well site?

  • Comments

Rig Up

  • Was a pre blasters safety meeting conducted with the rig crew/site personnel?

  • Comments

  • Was the rig up conducted according to TES SOP's?

  • Comments

  • Was a survey meter used while sourcing tools?

  • Comments

  • Was a Radiation warning sign and all PPE utilized during sourcing?

  • Comments

  • Were the tools "zeroed" at the proper point?

  • Comments

Running in the Hole

  • Was a casing check performed according to TES SOP's?

  • Comments

  • Was Surface Casing within 0.5m of expected depth?

  • Comments

  • Were appropriate winch speeds observed while running in?

  • Comments

  • Is TD +/- 1m of expected TD?

  • What action was taken?

Repeat Section

  • Was the "Squealer Valve" adjusted to minimize the risk of pull off?

  • Comments

  • Was a full 60m repeat log presented on all curves?

  • Comments

  • Was Dispatch notified at TD and given an estimated time of job completion?

  • Comments

Main Log

  • Are all curves on depth (+/- 0.1m) between Repeat and Main pass?

  • Comments

  • Do Repeat and Main pass curves repeat within defined tolerances?

  • Comments

  • Do all curves match the offset logs?

  • Comments

  • Were any anomalies repeated and recorded in log comments?

  • Comments

Logging Out

  • Were appropriate logging speeds observed during ascent?

  • Comments

  • Was the "Squealer Valve" adjusted while ascending to prevent pull off?

  • Comments

  • Were tools re=zeroed at surface to confirm depth?

  • Comments

Perforating/Mechanical Services

  • Was the depth of the perforating or setting service clearly understood by the TES Field Supervisor?

  • Comments

  • Was the generator shut down for arming and not turned back on until ballistic devises were >60m below surface?

  • Comments

  • Was the correlation technique reviewed with the client prior to performing the perforating or setting service?

  • Comments

  • Does Plug Back Total Distance match CH log PBTD?

  • Comments

  • Was the correlation performed in such a manner as to ensure that the perforating/setting device was positively on depth prior to executing the service?

  • Comments

  • Was the depth correlation obvious?

  • What action was taken?

  • Was perfect correlation obtained?

  • What action was taken?

  • Was the correlation log recorded and retained as evidence of being "on depth"?

  • Comments

  • Did qualified personnel arm the ballistic device?

  • Comments

  • Was electrical isolation maintained until the explosive device was safely down hole as required?

  • Comments

  • When coming out of the well were all safety procedures followed?

  • Comments

Rig Down

  • Was the "Squealer Valve" adjusted 2m before reaching surface?

  • Comments

  • Did the TES Field Supervisor receive permission to rig out equipment?

  • Comments

  • Were SOP's followed during rig down?

  • Comments

  • Were all Radiation Safety procedures followed during rig down?

  • Comments

  • Were the down hole tools cleaned properly on rig down?

  • Comments

  • Were post verifications within tolerance?

  • Comments

  • Was all TES equipment cleared from the rig floor, catwalk, etc.?

  • Comments

  • Was all TES equipment cleaned and serviced prior to being loaded?

  • Comments

Data Transmission

  • Was data transmitted according to the client's instructions?

  • Comments

  • Was PACS notified of all transmissions and client requirements?

  • Comments

  • Was client notified when the data was ready for viewing?

  • Comments

Job Completion at the Well Site

  • Were all the services requested by the client completed successfully?

  • Comments

  • Were any problems or anomalies recorded in the log header?

  • Comments

  • Was the job summary emailed to management and sales?

  • Comments

  • Was the SQI Worksheet completed and emailed in?

  • Comments

  • Did the client sign the work order?

  • Comments

  • Was an E-Ticket completed and transmitted before departing location?

  • Comments

  • Did the client receive the required logs, data CD, and copy of E-Ticket?

  • Comments

  • Were all necessary maintenance requests completed and entered into MC?

  • Comments

Post Job Departure

  • Did the TES Field Supervisor contact Dispatch prior to departing?

  • Comments

  • Were any problems (LTI, damaged tools, etc.) reported to Dispatch?

  • Comments

  • Was management and sales notified if a problem occurred that affected the quality of our service or product?

  • Comments

Summary

  • Supervisor job performance met minimum standards.

  • Comments

  • Operator job performance met minimum standards.

  • Comments

  • Overall job quality met minimum standards.

  • Comments

  • Additional Comments

  • Auditor Signature

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.