Information
-
Document No.
-
Field Supervisor
-
CH Unit #
-
Operator 1
-
Operator 2
-
Other
-
Customer
-
LSD
-
Services
- CNL
- ASET
- PERF
- CBL
- PL
- GR/CCL
- Other
-
Other Services Run
-
Conducted on
-
Auditor
-
Location
Pre-Departure, Job Planning and Arrival
-
Were all downhole tools checked before leaving the shop?
-
Were the surface computer, depth, and weight systems checked before leaving the shop?
-
Did the logger and pickup arrive 30 minutes early?
-
Was Dispatch contacted with estimated time to rig up?
-
Were the job requirements discussed with the well site rep?
-
Were all zones of interest obtained from the well site rep?
-
Were any difficult hole conditions identified/discussed with client?
Pre-Job Well Site Preparation
-
Was the FLRA form completed with all TES personnel prior to commencing operations?
-
Comments
-
Was the surface equipment checked before rig up?
-
Comments
-
Was the cable continuity/insulation checked before rig up?
-
Comments
-
Were all down hole tools checked before rig up?
-
Comments
-
Were the tool serial numbers visually confirmed and the calibrations verified by the Field Supervisor?
-
Comments
-
Explosives and/or Radiation warning signs posted at lease entrance?
-
Comments
-
Ground cables connected to well head and checked for stray voltage?
-
Comments
-
Are all tool calibrations current?
-
Comments
-
Was all appropriate running gear (centralizers, knuckles, etc.) utilized?
-
Comments
-
Was an offset log or Open Hole log downloaded?
-
Was an offset log or Open Hole log obtained at the well site?
-
Comments
Rig Up
-
Was a pre blasters safety meeting conducted with the rig crew/site personnel?
-
Comments
-
Was the rig up conducted according to TES SOP's?
-
Comments
-
Was a survey meter used while sourcing tools?
-
Comments
-
Was a Radiation warning sign and all PPE utilized during sourcing?
-
Comments
-
Were the tools "zeroed" at the proper point?
-
Comments
Running in the Hole
-
Was a casing check performed according to TES SOP's?
-
Comments
-
Was Surface Casing within 0.5m of expected depth?
-
Comments
-
Were appropriate winch speeds observed while running in?
-
Comments
-
Is TD +/- 1m of expected TD?
-
What action was taken?
Repeat Section
-
Was the "Squealer Valve" adjusted to minimize the risk of pull off?
-
Comments
-
Was a full 60m repeat log presented on all curves?
-
Comments
-
Was Dispatch notified at TD and given an estimated time of job completion?
-
Comments
Main Log
-
Are all curves on depth (+/- 0.1m) between Repeat and Main pass?
-
Comments
-
Do Repeat and Main pass curves repeat within defined tolerances?
-
Comments
-
Do all curves match the offset logs?
-
Comments
-
Were any anomalies repeated and recorded in log comments?
-
Comments
Logging Out
-
Were appropriate logging speeds observed during ascent?
-
Comments
-
Was the "Squealer Valve" adjusted while ascending to prevent pull off?
-
Comments
-
Were tools re=zeroed at surface to confirm depth?
-
Comments
Perforating/Mechanical Services
-
Was the depth of the perforating or setting service clearly understood by the TES Field Supervisor?
-
Comments
-
Was the generator shut down for arming and not turned back on until ballistic devises were >60m below surface?
-
Comments
-
Was the correlation technique reviewed with the client prior to performing the perforating or setting service?
-
Comments
-
Does Plug Back Total Distance match CH log PBTD?
-
Comments
-
Was the correlation performed in such a manner as to ensure that the perforating/setting device was positively on depth prior to executing the service?
-
Comments
-
Was the depth correlation obvious?
-
What action was taken?
-
Was perfect correlation obtained?
-
What action was taken?
-
Was the correlation log recorded and retained as evidence of being "on depth"?
-
Comments
-
Did qualified personnel arm the ballistic device?
-
Comments
-
Was electrical isolation maintained until the explosive device was safely down hole as required?
-
Comments
-
When coming out of the well were all safety procedures followed?
-
Comments
Rig Down
-
Was the "Squealer Valve" adjusted 2m before reaching surface?
-
Comments
-
Did the TES Field Supervisor receive permission to rig out equipment?
-
Comments
-
Were SOP's followed during rig down?
-
Comments
-
Were all Radiation Safety procedures followed during rig down?
-
Comments
-
Were the down hole tools cleaned properly on rig down?
-
Comments
-
Were post verifications within tolerance?
-
Comments
-
Was all TES equipment cleared from the rig floor, catwalk, etc.?
-
Comments
-
Was all TES equipment cleaned and serviced prior to being loaded?
-
Comments
Data Transmission
-
Was data transmitted according to the client's instructions?
-
Comments
-
Was PACS notified of all transmissions and client requirements?
-
Comments
-
Was client notified when the data was ready for viewing?
-
Comments
Job Completion at the Well Site
-
Were all the services requested by the client completed successfully?
-
Comments
-
Were any problems or anomalies recorded in the log header?
-
Comments
-
Was the job summary emailed to management and sales?
-
Comments
-
Was the SQI Worksheet completed and emailed in?
-
Comments
-
Did the client sign the work order?
-
Comments
-
Was an E-Ticket completed and transmitted before departing location?
-
Comments
-
Did the client receive the required logs, data CD, and copy of E-Ticket?
-
Comments
-
Were all necessary maintenance requests completed and entered into MC?
-
Comments
Post Job Departure
-
Did the TES Field Supervisor contact Dispatch prior to departing?
-
Comments
-
Were any problems (LTI, damaged tools, etc.) reported to Dispatch?
-
Comments
-
Was management and sales notified if a problem occurred that affected the quality of our service or product?
-
Comments
Summary
-
Supervisor job performance met minimum standards.
-
Comments
-
Operator job performance met minimum standards.
-
Comments
-
Overall job quality met minimum standards.
-
Comments
-
Additional Comments
-
Auditor Signature