Information
-
Document No.
-
Field Supervisor
-
OH Unit #
-
Operator # 1
-
Operator # 2
-
Other
-
Customer
-
LSD
-
Services
- CNP
- LDP
- CST
- PIT
- MLT
- DIP
- Other
-
Other Services Run
-
Conducted on
-
Auditor
-
Location
Pre-Departure, Job Planning and Arrival
-
Were all down hole tools checked before leaving the shop?
-
Comments
-
Were the surface computer, depth, weight and satellite systems checked before leaving the shop?
-
Comments
-
Did the Logger and Pickup arrive 30 minutes early?
-
Comments
-
Was Dispatch notified with ETA to rig up?
-
Comments
-
Were the job job requirements discussed with the well site Rep?
-
Comments
-
Were all potential Zones of Interest obtained from well site Rep?
-
Comments
-
Were any difficult hole conditions identified/discussed with the client?
-
Comments
Pre-Job Well Site Preparation
-
Was the FLRA form completed with all TES personnel prior to commencing operations?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was the surface equipment checked before rig up?
-
Comments
-
Was the satellite or phone connectivity checked before rig up?
-
Comments
-
Was the cable continuity/insulation checked before rig up?
-
Comments
-
Were all down hole tools checked on the catwalk before rig up?
-
Comments
-
Were the tool serial numbers visually confirmed and the calibrations verified by the TES Supervisor?
-
Comments
-
Are all tool calibrations current?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were all pre-verifications performed before rig up?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were all pre-verifications within tolerance?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was all appropriate running gear (centralizers, stand-offs, etc.) utilized?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was an offset log downloaded from the data portal before rig up?
-
Was an offset log obtained at the well site?
-
Comments
Rig Up
-
Was a pre rig up safety meeting conducted with the rig crew?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was the rig up conducted according to TES SOP's?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was a survey meter used while sourcing the tools?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was the Radioactive Materials warning sign and all PPE utilized during Rig up?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were the tools "zeroed" at the proper point (KB, Rig floor, etc.)?
-
Add media
-
Comments
Running in the Hole
-
Was a casing check performed according to TES SOP's?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was Surface Casing measured within 0.5m of SC Driller depth?
-
Were the tools re-zeroed?
-
Comments
-
Were the callipers adjusted in casing to correct pipe ID?
-
Comments
-
Was a down log recorded from the casing shoe to TD?
-
Comments
-
Were appropriate winch speeds observed while running in the hole?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were magnetic marks within tolerance (< 0.1m) on decent?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Is TD Logger +/- 1m of TD Driller?
-
What action was taken?
Repeat Section
-
Was the KERR Panel tension shut down set to minimize the risk of pull off?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was a full 60m repeat log presented on all curves?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was well created on the data portal?
-
Comments
-
Was well licence verified with an on-line source?
-
Comments
-
Was Dispatch notified at TD and given an estimated time of completion?
-
Comments
-
Was the client notified of TD if they requested to be?
-
Comments
Main Log
-
Are all curves on depth (+/- 0.1m) between repeat and main pass?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Do the Repeat and Main pass curves repeat within defined tolerances?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Do all curves match the offset logs?
-
Comments
-
Were any anomalies repeated and recorded in Log Comments?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were quality data measurements observed in all zones of interest?
-
Comments
-
Is hole rugosity affecting log response?
-
What action was taken?
-
Were the "Quick Beams" checked for spelling mistakes and quality before posting to Data Portal?
-
Comments
-
Were the "Quick Beams" posted to the Data Portal in a timely manner?
-
Comments
-
Was the Calgary contact notified that the "Quick Beams" were posted?
-
Comments
-
Were any problems discussed with the Geo?
-
Comments
Logging Out
-
Were appropriate logging speeds observed during ascent?
-
Comments
-
Was the KERR Panel tension shut down adjusted during ascent to minimize risk of pull off?
-
Comments
-
Were the magnetic marks within tolerance (< 0.1m) on ascent?
-
Comments
-
Does the Surface Casing depth on Main log match casing check?
-
What action was taken?
-
Were the tools re-zeroed at surface to confirm depth?
-
What action was taken?
Rig Down
-
Was the "Squealer Valve" set 1-2 meters before reaching the rig floor?
-
Comments
-
Did the TES Supervisor receive permission to rig out equipment?
-
Comments
-
Were all SOP's followed during rig down?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were all radiation safety procedures followed during rig down?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were all tools cleaned properly on rig down?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Were tool post verifications completed?
-
Comments
-
Were tool post verifications within tolerances?
-
Comments
-
Was all TES equipment cleared from the rig floor, catwalk, etc.?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was all TES equipment cleaned and checked prior to being loaded?
-
Add media
-
Comments
-
Was the cable head and line checked for leakage after the job?
-
Comments
Data Transmission
-
Were all of the services requested by the client completed successfully?
-
Comments
-
Were logs checked for quality and spelling?
-
Comments
-
Were all problems and log anomalies recorded in the log header?
-
Comments
-
Was the data transmitted according to the clients instructions?
-
Comments
-
Was the data package uploaded to PACS?
-
Comments
-
Was the client notified when the data was ready for viewing?
-
Comments
Job Completion at the Well Site
-
Was log data backed up?
-
Comments
-
Was job information entered into SharePoint?
-
Comments
-
Did the Client sign the Work Order?
-
Comments
-
Was an E-Ticket completed and transmitted before departing location?
-
Comments
-
Did the client receive the the required logs, LAS files, coy of E-Ticket?
-
Comments
-
Were all necessary maintenance requests entered into MC?
-
Comments
Post Job Departure
-
Did the TES Supervisor contact Dispatch prior to departing?
-
Comments
-
Were all problems (LTI, damaged tools, etc.) reported to Dispatch?
-
Comments
-
Was management and sales notified if a problem occurred that affected the quality of our service or product?
-
Comments
Stuck Tools/Fishing
-
Were all stuck tool procedures followed (eg. closing callipers)?
-
Comments
-
Was TES management, sales and the client notified of stuck tools?
-
Comments
-
Did Field Supervisor call in before pulling more than 50%?
-
Comments
-
Was a record kept of the tension pulled during attempts to free the tools?
-
Comments
-
Did the client receive an accurate diagram of the stuck tools?
-
Comments
-
Prior to fishing operations, was a safety meeting conducted?
-
Comments
-
Did the TES Field Supervisor prepare a detailed report and submit it to the OH Operations Manager and salesman?
-
Comments
Summary
-
Supervisor job performance met minimum standards.
-
Comments
-
Operator job performance met minimum standards.
-
Comments
-
Overall job quality met minimum standards.
-
Comments
-
Additional Comments
-
Auditor Signature