Title Page

  • Prepared by

  • Inspection Date

  • Location

2.0 - Planning and Management

  • 2.a - Is tree climbing the most appropriate method for carrying out the work?

  • Comments

  • 2.b - Has a suitable and sufficient recorded site-specific risk assessment been carried out?

  • Comments

  • 2.c - Do operators understand the risk assessment?

  • Comments

  • 2.d - Is there an opportunity for everyone on site to contribute to the site-specific risk assessment on the day of works?

  • Comments

  • 2.e - Are operators fully aware of the hazards and risks they are exposed to during the specific tree work at height task?

  • Comments

  • 2.f - Do operators know the control measures they must implement to ensure safe working and in turn create the safe system of work for carrying out the tree work?

  • Comments

  • 2.g - Have the control measures specified been carried out?

  • Comments

  • 2.h - Does the risk assessment process include dealing with emergencies?

  • Comments

  • 2.i - Are enough personnel present, including provision for rescue?

  • Comments

  • 2.j - Is the weather suitable for the tasks to be carried out?

  • Comments

  • 2.k - Has enough time been allocated to allow the work to be carried out safely and without applying undue pressure on the operational team?

  • Comments

3.0 - Roles and Responsibilities

  • 3.a - Do all operators understand their roles and responsibilities?

  • Comments

  • 3.b - Are operators proficient to carry out their assigned duties?

  • Comments

  • 3.c - Is there appropriate supervision in place to manage the tree work at height operation?

  • Comments

  • 3.d - Does everyone on site understand the communication method between climbers and ground staff? Is it clear, unambiguous and agreed by all?

  • Comments

4.0 - On-Site Preperation

  • 4.a - Have hazards and risks identified by the site-specific risk assessment process been adequately addressed?

  • Comments

  • 4.b - Has a tree condition assessment been carried out?

  • Comments

  • 4.c - Have clearly defined drop and working zones been established?

  • Comments

  • 4.d - Do all operators understand the limits of each zone?

  • Comments

  • 4.e - Are there established procedures in place (1) for when someone wants to enter a drop zone; (2) for materials to be dropped into a drop zone; and (3) when handling equipment above the drop zone?

  • Comments

  • 4.f - Is the extent of the work zone clear with adequate demarcation in place to prevent unauthorised access?

  • Comments

  • 4.g - Is PPE correctly worn and used by every operator in either zone?

  • Comments

5.0 - Occupational Health

  • 5.a - Can everyone on site maintain ‘situational awareness’?<br>Are they fit and well, physically and mentally?

  • Comments

  • 5.b - Is everyone on site aware of any individual operator’s limitations?

  • Comments

  • 5.c - Does anyone on site require increased protection from, or reduced exposure duration to, a particular hazard which may affect their health? If so, has this been implemented?

  • Comments

  • 5.d - Do the techniques selected for use minimise the risk of muscular-skeletal disorders and fatigue? Has equipment been chosen to meet the operator’s ergonomic requirements?

  • Comments

6.0 - Personal Fall Protection Systems in Tree Work

  • 6.a - Has the climber elected to use a system that allows them to ascend, move around the tree and descend appropriately?

  • Comments

  • 6.b - Does the system correctly comprise a primary system and backup, and does the backup provide protection against failure of the primary system, including main line, components and anchor?

  • Comments

  • 6.c - Are the correct connection points to the harness being used, appropriate to the operation?

  • Comments

  • 6.d - Have all the working considerations for using a personal fall protection system been taken into account by the climber?

  • Comments

7.0 - A Strategy for Access

  • 7.a - Do the methods selected take into account: the tree condition assessment, climbers’ abilities, training, surrounding features and tree structure?

  • Comments

  • 7.b - Have all aspects of the chosen access method and ascent technique been discussed and agreed as a safe method of working by the team?

  • Comments

  • 7.c - Is the work team familiar with the techniques to be used to allow an effective rescue to take place?

  • Comments

8.0 - Selecting an Ascent Technique

  • 8.a - Does the system correctly comprise primary and backup systems?

  • Comments

  • 8.b - Does the climber have the appropriate knowledge to safely ascend and descend on their chosen system?

  • Comments

  • 8.c - When an ascent technique is used, are the distance and consequences of a fall minimised?

  • Comments

  • 8.d - Does the climber use correct rope advance procedures during changeovers?

  • Comments

  • 8.e - Is the climber correctly anchored to the tree at all times?

  • Comments

  • 8.f - Are newly established anchors subjected to a full-body-weight test where practical?

  • Comments

  • 8.g - If spikes are used, is it possible to descend without solely having to spike back down<br>the stem?

  • Comments

9.0 - Managing Slack and Improving Climber Positioning

  • 9.a - Does the climber always remain anchored to the tree structure?

  • Comments

  • 9.b - Does the climber ensure that the fall protection system does not allow a potential fall distance to exceed 500mm?

  • Comments

  • 9.c - Are two high anchors used wherever practical?

  • Comments

  • 9.d - Has the climber included an adjustable lanyard as part of their system?

  • Comments

  • 9.e - Does the climber use their fall protection system appropriately to reduce the risk of pendulum swing?

  • Comments

10.0 - Decent

  • 10.a - Does the climber’s primary system allow for an uninterrupted descent to the ground?

  • Comments

  • 10.b - Does the climber check the length of rope before descent?

  • Comments

  • 10.c - Are the climber’s systems appropriately terminated?

  • Comments

  • 10.d - Is descent carried out in a controlled manner that minimises risk to the climber and potential equipment damage?

  • Comments

  • 10.e - Are anchor devices lowered in a controlled manner?

  • Comments

11.0 - Anchors and Anchor Point Selection

  • 11.a - Have operators been trained in anchor point selection?

  • Comments

  • 11.b - Can the selected anchor support any foreseeable loading?

  • Comments

  • 11.c - Have anchors been fully load-tested prior to ascent?

  • Comments

  • 11.d - Have load-bearing anchors within the tree been subjected to full-body-weight tests?

  • Comments

  • 11.e - Are climbers using equipment to create anchors in accordance with the<br>manufacturer’s guidance and is it suitable for its intended application?

  • Comments

12.0 - Equipment: General

  • 12.a - Is the equipment provided suited to the task?

  • Comments

  • 12.b Does everyone on site have the correct PPE and is it in good condition?

  • Comments

13.0 - Equipment Components: Building a System

  • 13.a - Does the selected climbing equipment meet the relevant conformity standard?

  • Comments

  • 13.b - Are all parts of the climber’s system correctly configured, in accordance with<br>manufacturer’s guidance?

  • Comments

  • 13.c - Are neighbouring components of the system compatible with each other?

  • Comments

  • 13.d - Are the standard(s) against which the equipment has been tested identifiable?

  • Comments

14.0 - Equipment for Tree Access and Rescue

  • 14.a - Are the components of the fall protection system being used correctly in accordance with manufacturer’s guidance?

  • Comments

  • 14.b - Do the components selected meet technical guidance requirements?

  • Comments

15.0 - Equipment: Inspection, Care, Storage and Maintenance

  • 15.a - Have operators received training in climbing equipment inspection, maintenance and

  • Comments

  • 15.b - Do specific users of equipment understand manufacturer’s recommendations for product lifespan, maintenance and storage?

  • Comments

  • 15.c - Are adequate records maintained of equipment issue, inspection, withdrawal and disposal?

  • Comments

  • 15.d - Are visual and tactile pre-use checks carried out to a proficient standard?

  • Comments

16.0 - Aerial Rescue

  • 16.a - Has an adequate rescue plan been prepared for aerial rescue?

  • Comments

  • 16.b - Are suitable and sufficient resources to make an effective rescue immediately available?

  • Comments

  • 16.c - Has the nominated rescuer(s) received training in rescue techniques and the equipment to be used?

  • Comments

  • 16.d - Does everyone understand their role and responsibility in the event of an aerial rescue?

  • Comments

  • 16.e - Have the nominated rescuer and the operatives involved practised rescue techniques at regular intervals to maintain skills?

  • Comments

  • 16.f - Can the casualty be removed from the tree safely without risk of injury to the rescuer?

  • Comments

Notes

  • Date of observations:

  • Location:

  • Observer’s name:

  • Signature:

  • Who is being observed?

  • Comments

  • Actions:

  • Reference:

  • Actions completed date:

  • Confirmed by:

  • Signature:

The templates available in our Public Library have been created by our customers and employees to help get you started using SafetyCulture's solutions. The templates are intended to be used as hypothetical examples only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. You should seek your own professional advice to determine if the use of a template is permissible in your workplace or jurisdiction. You should independently determine whether the template is suitable for your circumstances.