Is the ITP format consistent with Client ITP format expectation?
Does it show document No. (ie. ITP/ITC No.), issue number and issue date?
Are there separate areas for the contractor and Client representatives to sign?
Has a specific person/role been designated for signing off hold points and is this person on the Authorised Signature Register?
Is the ITP/ITC approved by an authorised quality representative of the sub/contractor?
Does it address OHS / Environmental critical activities?
Does this ITP relate to an identifiable work element / work lot type of the WBS of the project?
Do all the work activities/steps listed under that work element clearly represent the complete scope of the applicable drawing and not exclude any critical items?
Are all the activities under that work element properly listed in a sequence? Eg. Preliminaries / work content / closeout
Is the work area or location mentioned on the ITP?
Does it incorporate Client Hold & Witness points? Are these points clearly differentiated from the contractor’s own H & W points?
Does it reference specific clauses and drawing numbers rather than “as per Client specs”?
Does it reflect clear and comprehensive acceptance criteria (in term of numerical values) for each activity/step as stipulated in design/drawing, technical specifications and applicable standards.?
Is the method and frequency of testing clearly listed for each activity ?
Are the records to be kept as evidence clearly listed?
Does the ITP note that photos are required for buried assets and key pipeline connection points as a record?
In the Records column, does it clearly reference any checklists for repetitive items rather than having single signoff points which would not produce sufficient evidence of conformance with specifications.
Does this ITP meet BWA requirements?
Any other comment ?