AGFAB ITP INITIAL REVIEW CHECKLIST (Document Revision 23-9-2014)

• Client / Site/ Project:

• Agfab Project No :

• Conducted on:

  Date

• Prepared by:

  Select Alan Nield Graham Davis Greg Grima Ian McCormack George Lubczenko Chadi Khodr Leigh Ryan Steve Sweeny Roland Frost

  • Alan Nield
  • Graham Davis
  • Greg Grima
  • Ian McCormack
  • George Lubczenko
  • Chadi Khodr
  • Leigh Ryan
  • Steve Sweeny
  • Roland Frost

• ITP being reviewed:

• Document No.

ITP/ITC Format

• Is the ITP format consistent with Client ITP format expectation?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does it show document No. (ie. ITP/ITC No.), issue number and issue date?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Are there separate areas for the contractor and Client representatives to sign?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Has a specific person/role been designated for signing off hold points and is this person on the Authorised Signature Register?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

ITP Approval

• Is the ITP/ITC approved by an authorised quality representative of the sub/contractor?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

ITP Content

• Does it address OHS / Environmental critical activities?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does this ITP relate to an identifiable work element / work lot type of the WBS of the project?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Do all the work activities/steps listed under that work element clearly represent the complete scope of the applicable drawing and not exclude any critical items?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Are all the activities under that work element properly listed in a sequence? Eg. Preliminaries / work content / closeout

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the work area or location mentioned on the ITP?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does it incorporate Client Hold & Witness points? Are these points clearly differentiated from the contractor’s own H & W points?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

References

• Does it reference specific clauses and drawing numbers rather than “as per Client specs”?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Acceptance Criteria

• Does it reflect clear and comprehensive acceptance criteria (in term of numerical values) for each activity/step as stipulated in design/drawing, technical specifications and applicable standards.?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Inspection Method/Frequency

• Is the method and frequency of testing clearly listed for each activity ?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Records

• Are the records to be kept as evidence clearly listed?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does the ITP note that photos are required for buried assets and key pipeline connection points as a record?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Checklists:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• In the Records column, does it clearly reference any checklists for repetitive items rather than having single signoff points which would not produce sufficient evidence of conformance with specifications.

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Subcontractor ITP accepted?

• Does this ITP meet BWA requirements?

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Any other comment ?

Sign off

• Person conducting the review

  Sign