AGFAB ITP REVIEW CHECKLIST (Rev 1)

• Select date

  Date

General

• Client site: Barwon Water - Black Rock WRP 400 Black Rock road Connewarre

• Project No: 22884

• ITP No:

• ITP description:

ITP/ITC Format

• Is the ITP format consistent with Client ITP format expectation:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does it show document No. (ie. ITP/ITC No.), issue number and issue date:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Are there separate areas for the contractor and Client representatives to sign:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Has a specific person/role been designated for signing off hold points and is this person on the Authorised Signature Register:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

ITP Approval

• Is the ITP/ITC approved by an authorised quality representative of the sub/contractor:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

ITP Content

• Does it address OHS / Environmental critical activities:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does this ITP relate to an identifiable work element / work lot type of the WBS of the project:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Do all the work activities/steps listed under that work element clearly represent the complete scope of the applicable drawing and not exclude any critical items:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Are all the activities under that work element properly listed in a sequence: Eg. Preliminaries / work content / closeout

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is the work area or location mentioned on the ITP:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does it incorporate Client Hold & Witness points: Are these points clearly differentiated from the contractor’s own H & W points

  Yes

  No

  N/A

References

• Does it reference specific clauses and drawing numbers rather than “as per Client specs”

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Acceptance Criteria

• Does it reflect clear and comprehensive acceptance criteria (in term of numerical values) for each activity/step as stipulated in design/drawing, technical specifications and applicable standards:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Inspection Method/Frequency

• Is the method and frequency of testing clearly listed for each activity:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Records

• Are the records to be kept as evidence clearly listed:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Does the ITP note that photos are required for buried assets and key pipeline connection points as a record:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Checklists:

• In the Records column, does it clearly reference any checklists for repetitive items rather than having single signoff points which would not produce sufficient evidence of conformance with specifications:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Subcontractor ITP accepted

• Does this ITP meet client requirements:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Any other comment :

  Yes

  No

  N/A

ITP Status Inspection

• Is Agfab inspectorate up to date:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is Customer inspectorate up to date:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

• Is evidence available to verify records are up to date:

  Yes

  No

  N/A

Sign off

• Person completing the checklist

  Select Yes No N/A

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

• Signature of the person completing the checklist

  Sign

• Select date

  Date

• Client representative

• Signature of client representative

  Sign

• Select date

  Date