Title Page
-
Date
-
Operator
-
Dig Unit Location
-
Conducted By
Good Performance is
-
Good Performance is:
-
Hang Queue time average for the shift of 35 seconds or less.
-
Wait for Spot average for the shift 33 seconds or less.
-
Loading time average for the shift of 100 seconds or less.
-
Dig unit activities do not cause trucks to wait.
-
Accurate delay management.
Scoring System
-
For each criteria in this Field Verification provide a score from 1 - 5 to indicate the Field Officer's level of proficiency. The scoring system is as follows:
-
1. Not yet trained/does not understand the task/skill.
-
2. Has basic understanding of the task, but doesn’t always recognise when task needs to be performed, or cannot to perform the task without assistance.
-
3. Mostly understands the task but still requires further coaching to operate at the required level. Performs the task when required.
-
4. Competent – understands the task and completes it every time.
-
5. Has mastered the skill, could be considered an expert.
-
Is the bench and work area set up for efficient AH operation
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
How is the bench layout/set up impacting loading and what could be improved?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does the virtual mine model in the dynamic area, align with the physical mine model. so that the AHT do not pick up obstacles?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does Operator call AHT's into in cusp point as soon as possible, preventing unnecessary Hang while waiting for the AHT to travel to the cusp point?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does the Operator monitor queue/entry & exit locations to minimise hang and truck interchange time (e.g. no excessive travel to cusp point, AHT's being held up unnecessarily while spotting, AHT's travelling inefficient routes)?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
How could the queue/entry, exit & cusp point locations be improved to increase loading rate?
-
Does Operator check splits are built into their dynamic lanes?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does the Operator identifies when cusp point locations are affecting load time & communicates to AH Builder/Control?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does Operator use cusp preferences to move cusp location so as to improve truck cusping/spotting time?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does Operator call AH builder to help set cusp boundary preferences, if operator can not set cusp preference.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does Operator set the next spot early in the loading sequence (while loading current truck) so as to minimise truck spot time?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Get operator to demonstrate how to set spot point 2, using the terrain screen
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does Operator understand what Perception Masking of the Spot Points is.
-
Does the Operator Limiting the angle of approach of the AHT to the spot point, to helps reduce the possibility of detecting the load face as an obstacle.
-
Does Operator re-survey face at the appropriate intervals?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does the Operator load material in to AHT, so it's centered correctly.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Does Operator use gaps for bench clean-up so trucks are never waiting?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
Is floor dozer being utilised effectively at dig face? e.g. cleaning up regularly, not interrupting AHT's or loading unit unnecessarily, etc.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- N/A
-
How could the floor dozing be utilised more effectively?
Summary
-
Detail any additional coaching/observations made.
-
Detail any feedback received.
