Information
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
Absolute Completion & CRES SharePrice Project Evaluation Form
-
CPMO Project No.
-
CPMO Project Name
-
PM Name
-
Select date
1.0 Project Business Case UK RBB actions
-
1.1 Q - Project Team - Timeliness
Project Team & Stakeholders Identified inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
1.1 A - Project Team - Timeliness
-
1.2 Q - Business Case Paper - Timeliness
Business Case Prepared inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
1.2 A - Business Case Paper - Timeliness
-
1.3 Q - Business Case Paper - Detail
Business Case fully detailed enabling a decision (5/5)
Business Case basic in detail but sufficient for a decision (3/5)
Business Case insufficient in detail for a decision (0/5) -
1.3 A - Business Case Paper - Detail
2.0 Scheme Development CPMO actions
-
2.1 Q - Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment - Timelines
Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment undertaken inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days Late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
2.1 A - Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment - Timelines
-
2.2 Q - Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment - Detail
Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment fully detailed (5/5)
Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment basic in detail (3/5)
Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment inadequate in detail (0/5) -
2.2 A - Centres of Excellence Pre-Assessment - Detail
-
2.3 Q - Completed Project Brief & Due Diligence - Timeliness
Project Brief / Due Diligence report undertaken inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
2.3 A - Completed Project Brief & Due Diligence - Timeliness
-
2.4 Q - Completed Project Brief & Due Diligence - Detail
Project Brief / Due Diligence report fully detailed (5/5)
Project Brief / Due Diligence report basic in detail (3/5)
Project Brief / Due Diligence report inadequate in detail (0/5) -
2.4 A - Completed Project Brief & Due Diligence - Detail
-
2.5 Q - Redline Drawings - Timeliness
Redline Drawing undertaken inline with Planned date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
2.5 A - Redline Drawings - Timeliness
-
2.6 Q - Redline Drawings- Detail
Redline Drawings accurate in detail (5/5)
Redline Drawings inaccurate in detail (3/5)
Redline Drawings inadequate (0/5) -
2.6 A - Redline Drawings- Detail
-
2.7 Q - Initial Site Visit (ISV) - Timeliness
Initial Site Visit (ISV) undertaken inline with Planned date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
2.7 A - Initial Site Visit (ISV) - Timeliness
-
2.8 Q - Initial Site Visit (ISV) - Detail
Initial Site Visit (ISV) - all areas covered with no areas of vagueness (5/5)
Initial Site Visit (ISV) - all areas covered, some areas requiring further clarification (3/5)
Initial Site Visit (ISV) - ineffective meeting with much uncertainty remaining (0/5) -
2.8 A - Initial Site Visit (ISV) - Detail
-
2.9 Q - High Level Cost Submission - Timeliness
High Level Cost Submission received inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
2.9 A - High Level Cost Submission - Timeliness
-
2.10 Q - High Level Cost Submission - Budget
High Level Cost Submission inline with CPMO planned Budget (5/5)
High Level Cost Submission no more than 1% higher than planned Budget (3/5)
High Level Cost Submission in excess 1% higher than planned Budget (0/5) -
2.10 A - High Level Cost Submission - Budget
-
2.11 Q - Handover Pack Uploaded - Timeliness
Handover Pack produced inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days late (0/5) -
2.11 A - Handover Pack Uploaded - Timeliness
-
2.12 Q - Handover Pack Uploaded - Timeliness
Handover Pack fully detailed (5/5)
Handover Pack basic in detail but sufficient (3/5)
Handover Pack inadequate in detail (0/5) -
2.12 A - Handover Pack Uploaded - Timeliness
3.0 Approvals Stage CPMO/MC
-
3.1 Q - Planning Consent Submission
All Consents Submitted inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
3.1 A - Planning Consent Submission
-
3.2 Q - Mid Stage Review - Timeliness
Mid Stage Review undertaken inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
3.2 A - Mid Stage Review - Timeliness
-
3.3 Q - Mid Stage Review - Detail
Mid Stage Review - running smoothly with no areas of concern (5/5)
Mid Stage Review - progressing with some areas to address (3/5)
Mid Stage Review - significant sticking points which are unlikely to be resolved (0/5) -
3.3 A - Mid Stage Review - Detail
-
3.4 Q - Contractor Proposed Issued - Timeliness
Contractor Proposals Submitted inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
3.4 A - Contractor Proposed Issued - Timeliness
-
3.5 Q - Contractor Proposals Review - Guaranteed Maximum Price
Contractor Proposals fully detailed with acceptable Guaranteed Maximum Price (5/5)
Contractor Proposals acceptable with some clarification (3/5)
Contractor Proposals unsatisfactory (0/5) -
3.5 A - Contractor Proposals Review - Guaranteed Maximum Price
-
3.6 Q - Contractor Proposals Review - M&E Costs
M&E Costs with Guaranteed Maximum Price less than 20%
M&E Costs with Guaranteed Maximum Price greater than 20% but with justification
M&E Costs with Guaranteed Maximum Price Price unsatisfactory -
3.6 A - Contractor Proposals Review - M&E Costs
4.0 Mobilisation = CPMO/MC
-
4.1 Q - Works Instruction - Timeliness
Works Instruction issued inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
4.1 A - Works Instruction - Timeliness
-
4.2 Q - Works Instruction - Detail
Works Instruction issued with all details confirmed (5/5)
Works Instruction issued with some issues still to confirm (3/5)
Works Instruction inadequate (0/5) -
4.2 A - Works Instruction - Detail
-
4.3 Q - Preparation / Countdown Pack - Timeliness
Preparation / Countdown Pack issued inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
4.3 A - Preparation / Countdown Pack - Timeliness
-
4.4 Q - Preparation / Countdown Pack - Detail
Preparation / Countdown Pack produced with accurate and sufficient detail (5/5)
Preparation / Countdown Pack issued with limited detail (3/5)
Preparation / Countdown Pack inadequate (0/5) -
4.4 A - Preparation / Countdown Pack - Detail
-
4.5 Q - Consents Received - Timeliness
All Consents received inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
4.5 A - Consents Received - Timeliness
-
4.6 Q - F10 Received - Timeliness
F10 issued inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
4.6 A - F10 Received - Timeliness
-
4.7 Q - Pre-Start Meeting - Timeliness
Pre-Start Meeting held inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Actual Date up to 3 Days late (3/5)
Actual Date over 3 Days (0/5) -
4.7 A - Pre-Start Meeting - Timeliness<br>
5.0 Construction = CPMO
-
5.1 Q - Start On-Site Date
Start On-Site inline with Planned Date on KES (5/5)
Start On-Site late although agreed in advance with Barclays (3/5)
Start On-Site date late - Not agreed in advance with Barclays (0/5) -
5.1 A - Start On-Site Date
-
5.2 Q - Meeting Related Travel
Relative reduction in meeting related travel by 30% (5/5)
Relative reduction in meeting related travel by 20% (3/5)
Relative reduction in meeting related travel by less than 20% (0/5) -
5.2 A - Meeting Related Travel
-
5.3 Q - Average Waste Recycling Rate
Average Waste Recycling Rate 95% or greater (5/5)
Average Waste Recycling Rate 90-94.9% (3/5)
Average Waste Recycling Rate less than 89.9% -
5.3 A - Average Waste Recycling Rate
-
5.4 Q - Health & Safety Accidents
No Health & Safety / Environmental accidents on the Project (5/5)
Some minor accidents / incidents recorded against the Project (3/5)
A RIDDOR (or equivalent) accident recorded against the Project (0/5) -
5.4 A - Health & Safety Accidents
-
5.5 Q - Health & Safety / Environment Regulatory Enforcement
No HSE / EA / Local Authority Regulatory Enforcement - Health & Safety / Environment Issues (5/5)
Some reactive Regulatory engagement although no enforcement action (3/5)
Formal Enforcement Action issued / undertaken (0/5) -
5.5 A - Health & Safety / Environment Regulatory Enforcement
-
5.6 Q - Branch Manager Satisfaction Survey
Average Branch Manager Satisfaction Survey scores 9/10 or greater (5/5)
Average Branch Manager Satisfaction Survey scores 7/10 to 8.9/10 (3/5)
Average Branch Manager Satisfaction Survey scores less than 6.9/10 -
5.6 A - Branch Manager Satisfaction Survey
-
5.7 Q - Branch Employee Training
Branch Employee Training fully complete (5/5)
Branch Employee Training almost complete (3/5)
Branch Employee Training not completed satisfactorily (0/5) -
5.7 A - Branch Employee Training
-
5.8 Q - O&M Manual Completion
O&M Manual Checklist completed with no O&M issues to resolve (5/5)
O&M Manual Checklist completed with minor Manual issues to resolve (3/5)
O&M Manual unsatisfactory / not completed (0/5) -
5.8 A - O&M Manual Completion
-
5.9 Q - Security Checklist Completion
Security Checklist completed with no issues to resolve (5/5)
Security Checklist completed completed with minor issues to resolve (3/5)
Security Checklist unsatisfactory / not completed (0/5) -
5.9 A - Security Checklist Completion
-
5.10 Q - Asset Register Completion
Asset Register completed with no issues to resolve (5/5)
Asset Register completed with minor issues to resolve (3/5)
Asset Register unsatisfactory / not completed (0/5) -
5.10 A - Asset Register Completion
-
5.11 Q - Number of snags at Completion Handover
0 Snags at Completion Handover (5/5)
Between 1-19 Snags at Completion Handover (3/5)
More than 20 Snags at Completion Handover (0/5) -
5.11 A - Number of snags at Completion Handover
-
5.12 Q - As Built Drawings
As Built Drawings produced inline with Barclays IT Specification (5/5)
As Built Drawings produced but some minor IT specification issues to address (3/5)
As Built Drawings unsatisfactory (0/5) -
5.12 A - As Built Drawings
-
5.13 Q - Completion Handover
Completion Handover back to Barclays / ISS inline with Planned Dates on KES (5/5)
Completion Handover back to Barclays / ISS inline with agreed extension (3/5)
Completion Handover back to Barclays / ISS late (0/5) -
5.13 A - Completion Handover
-
5.14 Q - Final Account
Final Account agreed at Completion Handover (5/5)
Final Account agreed with 1 week from Handover (3/5)
Final Account agreed over 1 week from Completion Handover (0/5) -
5.14 A - Final Account
