Information
-
Document No.
-
Audit Title
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
-
Personnel
-
Corridor
Task allocation
-
Poor - Tasks poorly allocated workers unsure of job
Fair - Tasks allocated evenly, workers understand job
Good - Tasks allocated evenly – workers understand and have chance to ask questions on the job
Best practice - As ‘Good’ Tasks allocated with thought for strengths and weaknesses within the team and taking into account external factors including weather considerations. -
How would you describe the content of the Task Allocation?
Safety moment/issues raised
-
Poor - No safety moment or chance to raise issues
Fair - Safety moment and some safety issued discussed
Good - Relevant safety moment and all workers actively involved in safety discussion resulting in some hazard reports submitted. Workers actively engaged and contributing to discussions.
Best practice - As ‘Good’ safety issues raised automatically generate Hazard/Near miss report and safety message is embedded in workplace culture. -
How would you describe the summary of safety moment/issues raised?
Active engagement of workers
-
Poor - Little or no engagement of workers
Fair - Some engagement of workers as evidenced by two way comms
Good - Results shared with team and active discussion on how they can be improved
Best practice - As ‘Good’ - briefer engages and holds the attention of all workers throughout the brief and strong contribution from the team. -
What was the engagement level?
Results driven – with respect to the customer and worker safety
-
Poor - Results shared with team
Fair - Results shared with team
Good - Results shared with team and active discussion on how they can be improved.
Best practice - As ‘Good’ but with strong customer focus and best safety practice. -
Results driven – with respect to the customer and worker safety
