Information
-
Audit Title
-
Document No.
-
Client / Site
-
Conducted on
-
Prepared by
-
Location
-
Personnel
DATA
-
Complaint Type
-
Failure Type
-
Hazard Type
-
RISK RATING
-
Council infrastructure
-
Private property
ASSESSMENT WEIGHTING CRITERIA
-
Any hazards near location
-
Any failures near location
-
Any service infrastructure under pathway (eg sewer, water, storm water)
-
Existing constructed footpath
-
Connectivity to existing constructed pathways
-
Links to approved future works plans
-
Links to Living Street Strategy Walk & Cycle Plan
-
Current or under assessment DA's
-
PEDESTRIAN USAGE
-
High Use - CBD areas, shopping centers, aged care facilities, Hospitals, Schools
-
Medium Use - Parks adjoining High areas, churches and aged homes within urban areas; all medium or high density residential zones; strip shops or corner shops in residential areas. In parks, reserves and lane ways with unlimited access.
-
Low Use - All other areas. There is generally no specific provision for pedestrians or bike use.
OUTCOMES & ACTIONS
-
1. No further action
-
Advise provided to complainant
-
2. Refer to operations area for scheduling into routine maintenance program
-
Scope of works
-
3. Refer to operations area for scheduling into Capital Works program (Minor capital works < $30,0000)
-
Scope of works
-
4. List possible treatment for funding consideration on next financial year draft budget list (Major capital works > $30,000)
-
Scope of works
-
5. Prepare treatment concept - Emergent Works
-
Referral details (eg design section)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
-
Any additional information?
-
Sketch (if required)
-
Inspectors Name