Title Page
-
Audit conducted
-
Project
- PNA Minnesota
- Permasteelisa S.p.A.
- Scheldebouw B.V.
- Gartner
- PNA BTM
- PNA Modesto
- Permasteelisa Pty
- GASC
- Permasteelisa UK
- Permasteelisa France
- Permasteelisa Ireland
-
Subcontractor
-
Conducted on
-
Lead Auditor
-
Audit Team
-
Document No.
-
Location
-
Executive Summary
1 - Status of previous Audit
-
1.1 Actions from the previous audits and current status (Closed, Ongoing).
2 - Documented Health & Safety Policy (HSP)
-
2.1 Is there a current HSP
-
2.2 Does the HSP set Safety as a top priority for the Company and is a meaningful document?
-
2.3 Is the HSP easily accessed by, and reguarly review with employees?
-
2.4 Project risk register (is there evidence of the project risk register being reviewed and updated)?
-
2.5 Site diary maintained (is the site diary completed and up to date with all relevant information)?
-
2.6 Is supplier approved and appropriately licensed?
3 - Health & Safety
-
3.1 Was site walk carried out?
-
3.2 RAMS / Lifting Plans are being reviewed and submitted when and as required?
-
3.3 Has senior managers inspection been carried out?
-
3.4 Accident incident report (records and data protection are reports investigated and actions implemented where necessary)?
-
3.5 Are actions from inspections routinely effectively closed out?
-
3.6 Is there evidence of PUK/sub con and client communication regarding HSE matters?
-
3.7 Is M-Site being regularly used and maintained?
-
3.8 GiMS Mobile Hazard Alert frequency of use.
-
3.9 High Risk Review of RAMS are being recorded in Register
- Compliant
- Non-Compliant
- Opportunity for Improvement
- N/A
4 - Quality
-
4.1 Is the ITP accepted as per contract and formally issued to subcontractors?
-
4.2 Are checks carried, verified and recorded as per the ITP (sampled from ITP)?
-
4.3 Nonconformance Management (GiMS implementation and general usage including commercial)?
-
4.4 Do relevant reports identify equipment and calibration status & are cal certs available and current?
-
4.5 Is the tightening torque specified completed, checked and verified?
-
4.6 Are Certificate of Conformance available for torque tightened bolts?
-
4.7 Has RFID been set up and working effectively?
-
4.8 Can PUK demonstrate that they are sampling subcontractor works per ITP %?
-
4.9 Is Benchmark being installed in accordance with approved status?
-
4.10 Is there evidence of client inspection acceptance prior to protecting work areas and PUK verifying inspection completeness?
-
4.11 Handover / protection (All contract specific submissions/witness points should be agreed and verified)?
-
4.12 Structural Silicone Glazing control (training and records available and sample records)?
5 - Environment
-
5.1 Was site walk carried out?
-
5.2 Project Aspect & Impact Reg (issued and controlled)?
-
5.3 Has the Emergency Preparedness Procedure been cascaded to operatives. Are spill kits strategically located and personnel trained?
-
5.4 Is PUK waste properly segregated and disposed of?
6 - Continual Improvement
-
6.1 Good Observations.
-
6.2 Opportunity for Improvement.
-
6.3 Non-compliant.
7 - Close out Meeting
-
7.1 Was the close out meeting undertaken?
-
7.2 Manager(s) present at the close out meeting.
